<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU To Ask Court To Void Anti-Terror Oaths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#38;#38;#187; ACLU Will Swear No Oath</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49333</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#38;#38;#187; ACLU Will Swear No Oath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49333</guid>
		<description>[...] I have only one question here. Why does the ACLU of Ohio have a problem giving an oath that they are not terrorists and are not involved with terrorist groups? What the law is attempting to do is ensure people have not supported terrorist organizations. The law requires applicants under final consideration for a government job, contract or license to complete and sign questionnaires to determine if they have supported organizations on a federal list of terrorists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have only one question here. Why does the ACLU of Ohio have a problem giving an oath that they are not terrorists and are not involved with terrorist groups? What the law is attempting to do is ensure people have not supported terrorist organizations. The law requires applicants under final consideration for a government job, contract or license to complete and sign questionnaires to determine if they have supported organizations on a federal list of terrorists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49334</link>
		<dc:creator>Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49334</guid>
		<description>[...] I have only one question here. Why does the ACLU of Ohio have a problem giving an oath that they are not terrorists and are not involved with terrorist groups? What the law is attempting to do is ensure people have not supported terrorist organizations. The law requires applicants under final consideration for a government job, contract or license to complete and sign questionnaires to determine if they have supported organizations on a federal list of terrorists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have only one question here. Why does the ACLU of Ohio have a problem giving an oath that they are not terrorists and are not involved with terrorist groups? What the law is attempting to do is ensure people have not supported terrorist organizations. The law requires applicants under final consideration for a government job, contract or license to complete and sign questionnaires to determine if they have supported organizations on a federal list of terrorists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Ugly American.com &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU Claims Victory: Attorneys Not Required to Sign Terrorism Oaths</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49335</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Ugly American.com &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU Claims Victory: Attorneys Not Required to Sign Terrorism Oaths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 03:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49335</guid>
		<description>[...] I have only one question here. Why does the ACLU of Ohio have a problem giving an oath that they are not terrorists and are not involved with terrorist groups? What the law is attempting to do is ensure people have not supported terrorist organizations. The law requires applicants under final consideration for a government job, contract or license to complete and sign questionnaires to determine if they have supported organizations on a federal list of terrorists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have only one question here. Why does the ACLU of Ohio have a problem giving an oath that they are not terrorists and are not involved with terrorist groups? What the law is attempting to do is ensure people have not supported terrorist organizations. The law requires applicants under final consideration for a government job, contract or license to complete and sign questionnaires to determine if they have supported organizations on a federal list of terrorists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuck On Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49332</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuck On Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49332</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stop The ACLU Blogburst&lt;/strong&gt;
	 The above banner and slogan is quite deceptive and an utter joke to those that are truly aware to the ACLU&#039;s workings. Just in the past week the ACLU has launched a massive campaign against the NSA&#039;s efforts to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stop The ACLU Blogburst</strong><br />
	 The above banner and slogan is quite deceptive and an utter joke to those that are truly aware to the ACLU&#8217;s workings. Just in the past week the ACLU has launched a massive campaign against the NSA&#8217;s efforts to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right on the Right &#38;#38;#187; ACLU- &#38;#38;#8220;Safe and Free&#38;#38;#8221; Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49330</link>
		<dc:creator>Right on the Right &#38;#38;#187; ACLU- &#38;#38;#8220;Safe and Free&#38;#38;#8221; Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 04:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49330</guid>
		<description>[...] The ACLU consistently allign themselves with groups like CAIR, and other organizations that have known terrorist ties. They have turned down donations from some of their most generous donors because of anti-terrorism stipulations. They can always be seen defending our enemies. It is no wonder that they fight to exempt lawyers from anti-terror supporting oaths. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The ACLU consistently allign themselves with groups like CAIR, and other organizations that have known terrorist ties. They have turned down donations from some of their most generous donors because of anti-terrorism stipulations. They can always be seen defending our enemies. It is no wonder that they fight to exempt lawyers from anti-terror supporting oaths. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49331</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49331</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU: Working For A Less Secure America&lt;/strong&gt;
	 The above banner and slogan is quite deceptive and an utter joke to those that are truly aware to the ACLU&#039;s workings. Just in the past week the ACLU has launched a massive campaign against the NSA&#039;s efforts to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU: Working For A Less Secure America</strong><br />
	 The above banner and slogan is quite deceptive and an utter joke to those that are truly aware to the ACLU&#8217;s workings. Just in the past week the ACLU has launched a massive campaign against the NSA&#8217;s efforts to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaos_engineer</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49329</link>
		<dc:creator>chaos_engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49329</guid>
		<description>The law doesn&#039;t go far enough. What&#039;s the point making someone swear an oath that they can renounce the next day?

	We should ask people to get a permanent tattoo declaring that they aren&#039;t terrorists. I&#039;m thinking maybe two copies; one on the right hand and one on the forehead.

	If someone doesn&#039;t want to get the tattoo, then that&#039;s OK, but obviously they&#039;d be forbidden to hold government jobs or to go to public marketplaces.

	This might seem a little draconian, but, really, it&#039;s the only way we can be safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law doesn&#8217;t go far enough. What&#8217;s the point making someone swear an oath that they can renounce the next day?</p>
<p>	We should ask people to get a permanent tattoo declaring that they aren&#8217;t terrorists. I&#8217;m thinking maybe two copies; one on the right hand and one on the forehead.</p>
<p>	If someone doesn&#8217;t want to get the tattoo, then that&#8217;s OK, but obviously they&#8217;d be forbidden to hold government jobs or to go to public marketplaces.</p>
<p>	This might seem a little draconian, but, really, it&#8217;s the only way we can be safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gfactor</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49328</link>
		<dc:creator>gfactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 23:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49328</guid>
		<description>&quot;. Any moron could figure out American law is for Americans.&quot;

	That&#039;s where they used the word &#039;citizen.&#039; Elsewhere, they used different words. Any moron can read the words they used. Sorry if this doesn&#039;t fit into your exclusivist dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;. Any moron could figure out American law is for Americans.&#8221;</p>
<p>	That&#8217;s where they used the word &#8216;citizen.&#8217; Elsewhere, they used different words. Any moron can read the words they used. Sorry if this doesn&#8217;t fit into your exclusivist dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49327</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 21:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49327</guid>
		<description>Or it could be that the Framers allowed for common sense, something apparantly lost to the left. Any moron could figure out American law is for Americans. Its funny how liberals don&#039;t want us pushing our goverment on other countries but then want all foreigners to be protected under our laws. Incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it could be that the Framers allowed for common sense, something apparantly lost to the left. Any moron could figure out American law is for Americans. Its funny how liberals don&#8217;t want us pushing our goverment on other countries but then want all foreigners to be protected under our laws. Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gfactor</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-49326</link>
		<dc:creator>gfactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/14/aclu-to-ask-court-to-void-anti-terror-oaths/#comment-49326</guid>
		<description>Also, the 14th amendment talks about the &#039;privileges and immunities&#039; of citizens, but then also says that &#039;any person&#039; is entitled to due process and equal protection. A quite explicit distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the 14th amendment talks about the &#8216;privileges and immunities&#8217; of citizens, but then also says that &#8216;any person&#8217; is entitled to due process and equal protection. A quite explicit distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
