I’m pretty positive that I’m not a member of any political party, so I don’t know which party line I’m offering. My opinions are mine alone, and I speak for no one but myself.

Did you just call me gay? Well you know what you are? A CHAIR! How does that feel? (See, I take as much offense at you calling me gay as you do at me calling you a chair.) Honestly, a gay joke?

If the days a woman could conceive were as easy to predict as you imply, the Catholic Church would have had an easier time selling the rhythm method as a means of natural birth control.

I was trying to tell you nicely that our little chat was over because I was weary of your left wing prattle.

But, since you want to know how I really feel: You’re just another silly character in the liberal clown corps with nothing to offer but the party line of sophomoric talking points.

However, don’t think I don’t wish you well because I am letting Santa know about that naughty cabin boy the Captain secretly wants for Christmas.

However, please note that it is perfectly legal for a straight man and woman to marry and never procreate. Are they shunned for being “unnatural” even though the sex they have does not produce children?

While we’re on that subject, it is worth noting that a woman can only get pregnant during one short stretch of days out of each month. Is it disgusting or unnatural for a woman to have sex on the other days, since it is then impossible for her to conceive? Should we discourage that, too?

They will continue to mentally masturbate their way through their maze of moral relativism, feeling highly satisfied about themselves.

Maybe, someday, when they arrive at a place even they find disgusting, they will remember these stops along the road.

What is this duty you speak of? How does two people who love each other getting married affect anyone other than those two people?

I think any adult(s) should be able to marry any other adult(s) so long as there is consent of everyone involved. It’s funny, but you’re the second one to bring up dog marriage in the last week or so I’ve been discussing this issue. If your dog were capable of giving consent to marry, I’d say go for it! Maybe when dogs evolve a little more they will be able to, but for now, they can’t.

And the majority should not be able to discriminate against the minority, no matter how small the minority. That’s one of the beauties of our Constitution.

Society has the right and the duty to regulate marriage. One may disagree but that doesn’t make their opinion superior or correct.

We are not allowed to marry our parents, siblings, children, multiple partners or people of the same sex. Some may disagree with these laws but the laws are the same for us all.

Those laws apply to everyone equally. If I want to marry my dog and the law doesn’t allow it, that does not mean I am being discriminated against. It only means society does not condone my aberrant behavior.

Same-sex marriage bans, denial of marriage-related benefits, adoption prohibitions, numerous cases of discrimination. Those are the biggies I can think of off the top of my head.

Go down one by one in the bill of rights.