California Supremes: Oral sex with kids is OK!

Via Kevin McCullough at WND

On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court voted 6 to 1 to not force those convicted of having oral sex with underage kids to register as sex offenders with the state. The majority judges said that the law was “too harsh and unfair.” Yes, I’m sure that the problem with such enforcement is the resolute “unfairness” of punishing those who know it is a crime and yet do it anyway. How terrible.

The judges justified their conclusion by citing the fact that under the state laws of California people convicted of having actual sexual intercourse with those who are 16 and 17 years of age are not forced to register as a sex offender. Their argument claims a lack of equal protection under the law.

So help me understand something. Because the laws are all screwed up about the sentencing of a crime that is even worse than the one that is committed, therefore we have to let those who commit serious crimes off easy? For some reason, there is an aversion to tough punishment in the liberal courts today.

There was a time when those who broke God’s moral laws were marked by society. The scarlet letter emblazoned, people went about their lives, but they were shunned, kept very much at arm’s length from the whole of society.

In World War II, girls who slept with the Nazis in the occupied territories had their heads shaved upon liberation to identify them as weak, dangerous and even traitors to the homelands. In 2006, the sex-offender registration is a poor substitute for identifying the degenerates among us, yet it is the best system we have.

I’d personally much rather see those who have sex with children be dragged to the public square, have their crimes announced to society, and publicly executed. Their filth lives on in the minds of the victims whom they molest and that is all the life they deserve at that point.

But not in California.

Not in California’s Supreme Court. Here, the brightest minds the California legal system can produce – who assumingly have children and families of their own – are the ones that see the danger, look it straight in the face, and utter the words “harsh” and “unfair.” Now, the judges who should be the “most respected” (insert guffaw here) are telling the citizens in their state that those convicted of having sex with children isn’t something the rest of the state should have the right to know about if someone is only convicted of stripping the minor and placing their mouth in contact with the child’s genitals.

I disagree with Kevin about executing child molesters. I think this would be far too merciful. I’m not against their execution, but I think they should have to suffer as much shame, guilt, and humiliation as possible first. I do agree with everything else he said in his analysis. No matter what one thinks on the issue of rehabilitation, which I have seen zero evidence of, these sickos should most definitely be marked and identified by society. Our laws are nowhere near harsh enough for these criminals already, and our Justice system is even more broken when it comes to laying out adequate punishment for those that defile innocent children. Now California has pretty much given a blanket approval of oral sex with kids. It makes me sick to my stomach.

Linked At:

OTA Weekend
Gribbit’s Word Saturday Open Trackbacks

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Email This Email This

Posted by Jay on March 11, 2006 5:59 pm

» Filed Under ACLU, Child Exploitation, News

Trackback URL:

Links

Comments

5 Responses to “California Supremes: Oral sex with kids is OK!”

  1. LomaAlta on March 12th, 2006 1:15 am

    California courts, whether state or federal, are so far from mainstream America I wonder if CA will ever recover or is lost as a civilized place.

    I wonder why the decent people of CA don’t do more to fight all the radical left evil there?

  2. kerwin_brown on March 12th, 2006 8:38 am

    California as a whole is destructive of parental rights. If you are a parent and live in California then you are oppressed. If the parents of California are willing to live as slaves to the government, and the failure of California Proposition 73 on parental consent makes me that is so, then there is nothing I can do for them. It is sad that the people of the United States have so easily given up their freedom.

  3. Jamsnagrom on March 13th, 2006 11:36 am

    I would love to give these morons a piece of my mind and I’d hope they would choke on it. This is unacceptable. I think the six imbeciles need to be impeached. This was a bad decision. I praise Marvin Baxter for his bold decision, though.

  4. Michael Gordon on May 6th, 2007 11:28 pm

    Jay says: ” Because the laws are all screwed up about the sentencing of a crime that is even worse than the one that is committed, therefore we have to let those who commit serious crimes off easy?”

    So Jay admits that sex offender registration is punisment. Thanks for clearing this up, Jay. The state has no legitimate business horning-into sexual relations between consenting individuals, and if this upsets some of you parents out there, then I have a suggestion for you: you control your kids, don’t ask the state to do it for you. What your son wants to do with his penis is for him to say, not the courts.

  5. Michael Gordon on May 6th, 2007 11:31 pm

    Jay says:
    “I’d personally much rather see those who have sex with children be dragged to the public square, have their crimes announced to society, and publicly executed.”

    The thing about fascism is that it truly is all about the family. And it’s easy to be a fascist. All you have to do is follow.

  • Advertise

  • Donate

  • Our Store

    • ACLU Bulldozer
    • Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
  • Syndicate Me