<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CALLING FOR SPECIAL COUNSEL TO INVESTIGATE THE ACLU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:03:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Culture &#38;#38;#187; Stop the ACLU Blogburst - &#38;#38;#8220;I&#38;#38;#8217;m Not A Terrorist&#38;#38;#8221; Not Required</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47210</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Culture &#38;#38;#187; Stop the ACLU Blogburst - &#38;#38;#8220;I&#38;#38;#8217;m Not A Terrorist&#38;#38;#8221; Not Required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47210</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#38;#8217;t see what the problem is. The State doesn&#38;#8217;t want its money going to individuals that might support terror. What problem does the ACLU have with not supporting terror? Why don&#38;#8217;t they just come out and say that they do support it? What is absurd is that no one is investigating the ACLU for terror ties. Start out with one or two of its employees, and go from there. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#38;#38;#8217;t see what the problem is. The State doesn&#38;#38;#8217;t want its money going to individuals that might support terror. What problem does the ACLU have with not supporting terror? Why don&#38;#38;#8217;t they just come out and say that they do support it? What is absurd is that no one is investigating the ACLU for terror ties. Start out with one or two of its employees, and go from there. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47211</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47211</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No Oaths From ACLU&lt;/strong&gt;
	Via ACLU Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist groups. The American Civil Liberties...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No Oaths From ACLU</strong><br />
	Via ACLU Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist groups. The American Civil Liberties&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop The ACLU &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: Refusal To Be Investigated Is Evidence Of Guilt</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47188</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop The ACLU &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: Refusal To Be Investigated Is Evidence Of Guilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47188</guid>
		<description>[...] While I have no solid evidence that the ACLU, CAIR, Greenpeace, anti-war groups etc. are illegally corresponding, or funding terrorists, there are many reasons to be suspicious. There are plenty of reasons that they should be investigated.  The ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because they objected to promising that none of the funds would be used to engage in any activity that promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state. They got the provision scrapped after a long and vigorous fight, then accepted the funds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While I have no solid evidence that the ACLU, CAIR, Greenpeace, anti-war groups etc. are illegally corresponding, or funding terrorists, there are many reasons to be suspicious. There are plenty of reasons that they should be investigated.  The ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because they objected to promising that none of the funds would be used to engage in any activity that promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state. They got the provision scrapped after a long and vigorous fight, then accepted the funds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Investigate the ACLU</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47209</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Investigate the ACLU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47209</guid>
		<description>[...] From “Stop the ACLU“: I am calling on Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America, to call a Special Counsel to investigate possible criminal wrongdoing and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those responsible within the ACLU for any damage to top secret programs that have been enacted in furtherance of National Security and the war on terror; any funding directly or indirectly aiding a terrorist organization; giving representation, aid and comfort to admitted terrorists; invading the privacy of their own members; hindering the ability of the government to protect the citizens of the Untied States of America; and any attempt to destroy evidence of any of these acts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From “Stop the ACLU“: I am calling on Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America, to call a Special Counsel to investigate possible criminal wrongdoing and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law those responsible within the ACLU for any damage to top secret programs that have been enacted in furtherance of National Security and the war on terror; any funding directly or indirectly aiding a terrorist organization; giving representation, aid and comfort to admitted terrorists; invading the privacy of their own members; hindering the ability of the government to protect the citizens of the Untied States of America; and any attempt to destroy evidence of any of these acts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerwin_brown</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47187</link>
		<dc:creator>kerwin_brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47187</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from a group which was founded by members who were admitted anarchist and whose stated intention is to overthrow the American government and put in their own government.  They are also funded by the Open Society Institute who wishes to overthrow our government and install a European style Democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from a group which was founded by members who were admitted anarchist and whose stated intention is to overthrow the American government and put in their own government.  They are also funded by the Open Society Institute who wishes to overthrow our government and install a European style Democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47208</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 06:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47208</guid>
		<description>Special counsel? or Congressional hearings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Special counsel? or Congressional hearings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47207</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47207</guid>
		<description>&quot;Christian Reconstructionists are totalitarians and the enemies of liberty.&quot;

	Sure, by restoring America to what it was originally, before the communists took over.

	&quot;They defend religous people all the time.&quot;

	And fight to have their rights removed.

	&quot;I’ve heard that only from people who hate the ACLU. Considering everything else, I don’t have any particular reason to believe it’s true.&quot;

	Yet you believe everything out of the socialist left machine before an investigation is even conducted. Very objective of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Christian Reconstructionists are totalitarians and the enemies of liberty.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Sure, by restoring America to what it was originally, before the communists took over.</p>
<p>	&#8220;They defend religous people all the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>	And fight to have their rights removed.</p>
<p>	&#8220;I’ve heard that only from people who hate the ACLU. Considering everything else, I don’t have any particular reason to believe it’s true.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Yet you believe everything out of the socialist left machine before an investigation is even conducted. Very objective of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47206</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47206</guid>
		<description>&quot;They fought this provision tooth and nail until they got the rule scrapped. They are now defending an individual that participated in a 15-year conspiracy to finance the group Hamas, laundering millions of dollars, some of which went to buy weapons. &quot;

	Its quite reasonable that a civil liberties organization would turn down this sort of condition. A case can set broad civil liberties precedent yet have an accused terrorist as a party.

	Its analagous to the recent filesharing case of Grokster. Plenty of organizations filed briefs in support of Grokster, because this case would set incredible precedent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They fought this provision tooth and nail until they got the rule scrapped. They are now defending an individual that participated in a 15-year conspiracy to finance the group Hamas, laundering millions of dollars, some of which went to buy weapons. &#8221;</p>
<p>	Its quite reasonable that a civil liberties organization would turn down this sort of condition. A case can set broad civil liberties precedent yet have an accused terrorist as a party.</p>
<p>	Its analagous to the recent filesharing case of Grokster. Plenty of organizations filed briefs in support of Grokster, because this case would set incredible precedent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47205</guid>
		<description>Follow the link about them spying, and then follow the sources...you will see that it is sourced from staff members within the ACLU, and given to us by the liberal NY Times.  Or, go on believing in the lies the ACLU want you to think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the link about them spying, and then follow the sources&#8230;you will see that it is sourced from staff members within the ACLU, and given to us by the liberal NY Times.  Or, go on believing in the lies the ACLU want you to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedSonja2000</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-47204</link>
		<dc:creator>RedSonja2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/17/calling-for-special-counsel-to-investigate-the-aclu/#comment-47204</guid>
		<description>Jay:
	&quot;read how the ACLU spied on its own members&quot;

	I&#039;ve heard that only from people who hate the ACLU. Considering everything else, I don&#039;t have any particular reason to believe it&#039;s true.

	Not everyone who spouts Reconstructionist ideas is a card-carrying Reconstructionist. They are adept at getting other peole to strip themselves of their own rights--or at least advocate it.

	I actually hope the ACLU *is* investigated for &quot;anti-religious bias.&quot; They defend religous people all the time. They have even had Pat Robertson as a client. Such an investigation will make these folks look like the schmucks they are.

	&quot;its actions indicate they want to stamp out freedom and our religious liberty all over America&quot;

	&quot;religious liberty&quot; does not include using the power of the government to further a religious agenda. When the ACLU starts calling for all churches to be closed down, get back to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay:<br />
	&#8220;read how the ACLU spied on its own members&#8221;</p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve heard that only from people who hate the ACLU. Considering everything else, I don&#8217;t have any particular reason to believe it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>	Not everyone who spouts Reconstructionist ideas is a card-carrying Reconstructionist. They are adept at getting other peole to strip themselves of their own rights&#8211;or at least advocate it.</p>
<p>	I actually hope the ACLU *is* investigated for &#8220;anti-religious bias.&#8221; They defend religous people all the time. They have even had Pat Robertson as a client. Such an investigation will make these folks look like the schmucks they are.</p>
<p>	&#8220;its actions indicate they want to stamp out freedom and our religious liberty all over America&#8221;</p>
<p>	&#8220;religious liberty&#8221; does not include using the power of the government to further a religious agenda. When the ACLU starts calling for all churches to be closed down, get back to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
