<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU PROTECTING FUNERAL PROTESTERS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kender</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46055</link>
		<dc:creator>kender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46055</guid>
		<description>actus, it actually says &quot;respecting an establishment of religion&quot;...in it&#039;s entirety it says &lt;strong&gt;&quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;&lt;/strong&gt;
	&quot;Make no law&quot;: Congress CANNOT create a law;

	&quot;respecting an establishment of religion&quot;: that ESTABLISHES a religion.

	Even taken wrongfully but literally like the left desires it, such as &quot;congress shall make no law that shows deference to a religion&quot; would mean that prayer is NOT against the constitution at a school function, since CONGRESS HAS NOT MADE A LAW SAYING YOU MUST PRAY!!!!!!!!!


	What part of this do you morons on the left NOT UNDERSTAND????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actus, it actually says &#8220;respecting an establishment of religion&#8221;&#8230;in it&#8217;s entirety it says <strong>&#8220;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;</strong><br />
	&#8220;Make no law&#8221;: Congress CANNOT create a law;</p>
<p>	&#8220;respecting an establishment of religion&#8221;: that ESTABLISHES a religion.</p>
<p>	Even taken wrongfully but literally like the left desires it, such as &#8220;congress shall make no law that shows deference to a religion&#8221; would mean that prayer is NOT against the constitution at a school function, since CONGRESS HAS NOT MADE A LAW SAYING YOU MUST PRAY!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>	What part of this do you morons on the left NOT UNDERSTAND????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46056</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46056</guid>
		<description>Just a note to clarify, that picture is of the Patriot Guard Riders, and not the whacko protestors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note to clarify, that picture is of the Patriot Guard Riders, and not the whacko protestors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homespun Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46057</link>
		<dc:creator>Homespun Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46057</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Best Of Homespun Bloggers February 5th&lt;/strong&gt;
	Best Of Homespun Bloggers February 5th</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Best Of Homespun Bloggers February 5th</strong><br />
	Best Of Homespun Bloggers February 5th</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sgt Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46080</link>
		<dc:creator>Sgt Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46080</guid>
		<description>I am tired of the ACLU, we need to band together and HIRE BETTER LAWYERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am tired of the ACLU, we need to band together and HIRE BETTER LAWYERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dread Pundit Bluto</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46079</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dread Pundit Bluto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 03:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46079</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Riders Guard Soldier Funerals From Protesters&lt;/strong&gt;
	Unfortunately, that&#039;s not obvious to the ACLU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Riders Guard Soldier Funerals From Protesters</strong><br />
	Unfortunately, that&#8217;s not obvious to the ACLU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Aut Morire</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46078</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince Aut Morire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46078</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Riders Guard Soldier Funerals From Protesters&lt;/strong&gt;
	Stop the ACLU and Patriotic Mom post about protestors disrupting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Riders Guard Soldier Funerals From Protesters</strong><br />
	Stop the ACLU and Patriotic Mom post about protestors disrupting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46077</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46077</guid>
		<description>&quot;What do you base that on, apostle? Where in the federal budget should I go to find their line item? I’m willing to believe you, but something more than a bald assertion would be nice.&quot;

	I&#039;m basing that on acts performed by guys like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sunnetworks.net/~ggarman/indian.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jefferson,&lt;/a&gt; one of the key founders of the Constitution, who was NOT a Christian by the way.


	&quot;We have to follow what they did 200 years ago to have freedom today.&quot;

	You&#039;re unbelievable. What is your definition of freedom? Should there be no rules, no authority of any kind at school? No respect? A student having to stand while others say the pledge is not the removal of nor is it an impingment on his freedom. Keeping your mouth shut while students say a prayer is not a violation of anyone&#039;s civil liberties. Preventing it is. You act as if the establishment clause is there to protect you from things that offend you and you&#039;re wrong. What about the liberty of free speech? A teacher praying in front of class is an exercise of free speech. Teachers aren&#039;t in the military, government or no, so they have the same freedom of speech and religion we do. Kids do not have to actually pray with the teacher. They have to TOLERATE it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What do you base that on, apostle? Where in the federal budget should I go to find their line item? I’m willing to believe you, but something more than a bald assertion would be nice.&#8221;</p>
<p>	I&#8217;m basing that on acts performed by guys like <a href="http://www.sunnetworks.net/~ggarman/indian.html" rel="nofollow">Jefferson,</a> one of the key founders of the Constitution, who was NOT a Christian by the way.</p>
<p>	&#8220;We have to follow what they did 200 years ago to have freedom today.&#8221;</p>
<p>	You&#8217;re unbelievable. What is your definition of freedom? Should there be no rules, no authority of any kind at school? No respect? A student having to stand while others say the pledge is not the removal of nor is it an impingment on his freedom. Keeping your mouth shut while students say a prayer is not a violation of anyone&#8217;s civil liberties. Preventing it is. You act as if the establishment clause is there to protect you from things that offend you and you&#8217;re wrong. What about the liberty of free speech? A teacher praying in front of class is an exercise of free speech. Teachers aren&#8217;t in the military, government or no, so they have the same freedom of speech and religion we do. Kids do not have to actually pray with the teacher. They have to TOLERATE it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: High Country Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46076</link>
		<dc:creator>High Country Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 01:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46076</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Idiots on Parade (Again)&lt;/strong&gt;
	Via Michael Silence, The &quot;Reverend&quot; Fred Phelps and his cultists are returning to Tennessee, this time to Clarksville to protest another military funeral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Idiots on Parade (Again)</strong><br />
	Via Michael Silence, The &#8220;Reverend&#8221; Fred Phelps and his cultists are returning to Tennessee, this time to Clarksville to protest another military funeral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46075</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 22:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46075</guid>
		<description>&quot;The ACLU makes its money by suing the federal government. Every time the ACLU sues the federal government their legal fees are paid by the federal government. That is why the ACLU takes on all these ridiculous lawsuits.&quot;

	Makes sense that civil rights not be just for the rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The ACLU makes its money by suing the federal government. Every time the ACLU sues the federal government their legal fees are paid by the federal government. That is why the ACLU takes on all these ridiculous lawsuits.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Makes sense that civil rights not be just for the rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/comment-page-1/#comment-46074</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/02/02/aclu-protecting-funeral-protesters/#comment-46074</guid>
		<description>Whenever they win a case, there is a clause in the Civil Rights Act, that gives the Judge the right to grant the payment of attorney&#039;s fees via our tax dollars.  They almost always grant this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever they win a case, there is a clause in the Civil Rights Act, that gives the Judge the right to grant the payment of attorney&#8217;s fees via our tax dollars.  They almost always grant this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
