Comments on: National Sanctity of Human Life Day

By: Rants

Rants — Tue, 24 Jan 2006 03:58:08 +0000

Too Many
While I have to agree with the sentiments expressed by the president regarding the sanctity of life, I feel that declaring yet another offical “day” on the subject goes entirely too far-and accomplishes almost nothing…

By: apostle

apostle — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:54:01 +0000

“What Mr. Ivy does not understand is that the majority rules”

True enough. The only way anything gets done in this country is through a majority of some type. For something to become law, it is voted on in Congress, decided by a majority. To interpret the law, the Supreme Court decides by a majority. We don’t let the bill with the least amount of votes, or the ruling with the least amount of votes win the day. The left is just upset that we still, and will have for some time, the majority. Even with a supposed lack of support for Bush, Dems still can’t get up in the polls. America is through with them.

By: Peter Bella

Peter Bella — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:41:38 +0000

What Mr. Ivy does not understand is that the majority rules. We all have rights, priviledges, and responsibilities. They are all protected and punished. If Mr. Ivy and the minority want a greater say in the process they should do the most important single thing they can to promulgate their ideology- win enough elections to become a majority.

Point two; your rights are respected by the majority. You are just angered that you are not taken seriously by the majority and your rights are not good public policy. If your rights were not respected, you would be in prison or worse.

You have the right to bloviate, deviate, or meditate. You don’t have the votes. Too bad. You lose.

By: RightWinged.com

RightWinged.com — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:54:13 +0000

Study On Bias Abortion Terminology &#38; South Dakota Bill Attempts To Ban Abortion
hat tip Drudge Report In the next few weeks, South Dakota lawmakers will vote on a bill intended to make abortion illegal. I don’t know anything about the state of politics in South Dakota so this may be just to…

By: apostle

apostle — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:39:49 +0000

“Well apparently I’m a racist because I blamed Nagin for the mess after Katrina.”

How does that work out?

By: DeathMetalCookieMonster

DeathMetalCookieMonster — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:38:26 +0000

This is rich! I went to the link of the liberal blog. After reading the comments I made my own. Well apparently I’m a racist because I blamed Nagin for the mess after Katrina.

By: apostle

apostle — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:03:02 +0000

This is what I find hilarious about the left. Take the two issues of abortion and social security. On one hand, they tell us that we are too stupid and irresponsible to save our own money. We need the governments’ “help.” We are way to dumb to understand the complexities of the stock market, or the investment procedure. Got it? But we are at the same time so responsible and infinitely wise that we can make life and death decisions over life of an unborn child. So we can’t be trusted with money, but we can be trusted with unborn children.

By: DeltaFox

DeltaFox — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:39:12 +0000

“I don’t see abortion being illegal in this country anytime soon.”

Neither do I.

The Dems are trying hard to instill the fear that Roe vs. Wade will be overturned, a desperate ploy to try and keep Alito out.

By: apostle

apostle — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:33:06 +0000

“I don’t see abortion being illegal in this country anytime soon.”

I agree. As much as I’d like him too, people are dreaming that the Supreme Court will just go in and wipe out abortion.

“If the religious majority is sucessful in subjecting the minority, then the outcome is similar to Stalin imposing his will on those who would dare to defy him. Different substance but the same form”

Its not the religious majority, its just the majority. That is a scare tactic. You put “religious” out front and it makes people uncomfortable. It has nothing to do with majority on this one, it has to do with bad law. Abortion is not covered under the 2nd amendment, or any other. Conservatives understand that one cannot prove that a fetus is a human, and one cannot prove that a fetus is not. Since that is the case, it is better for law to er on the side of caution.

“What’s next? Do you plan to purge us?”

Same old garbage. No one is talking about eliminating the rights of the minority. But you can’t reject the rights of the majority for the sake of the minority. Liberals need to understand that. This is not freedom of religion either. Abortion is bad law under our Constitution. Period.

By: peter ivy

peter ivy — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:40:04 +0000

While I respect another person’s right to express their opinion, I will never believe that a religous majority should have the right to dictate governmental policy over minority factions, factions that may inclue an atheistic minority.

If the religious majority is sucessful in subjecting the minority, then the outcome is similar to Stalin imposing his will on those who would dare to defy him. Different substance but the same form.

What’s next? Do you plan to purge us? Please let us know, cuz as pagans, as ironic as it sounds, we are also strong believers in the second amendment (an believers in ballistic co-efficients as well).

Truly sincerely.