<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eminent Domain Irony, Activists Seek to Evict Souter From Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:59:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Wide Awakes &#38;#38;#187; ACLU Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45074</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wide Awakes &#38;#38;#187; ACLU Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45074</guid>
		<description>[...] Since the 5th amendment is pretty much already gone under judicial tyranny, one of the first things you can kiss goodbye is the 2nd amendment. The U.N. are already pushing for international gun control laws, and you can bet the ACLU won&#38;#8217;t fight against that. ACLU POLICY “The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court’s long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individual’s right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms.” –Policy #47 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since the 5th amendment is pretty much already gone under judicial tyranny, one of the first things you can kiss goodbye is the 2nd amendment. The U.N. are already pushing for international gun control laws, and you can bet the ACLU won&#38;#38;#8217;t fight against that. ACLU POLICY “The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court’s long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individual’s right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms.” –Policy #47 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45073</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45073</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Nation&lt;/strong&gt;
	Stop The ACLU I thought it would be interesting and informative to illustrate what our Nation might be like if it caved into all of the radical ideals of the ACLU. It ended up quite scary, and if we were...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Nation</strong><br />
	Stop The ACLU I thought it would be interesting and informative to illustrate what our Nation might be like if it caved into all of the radical ideals of the ACLU. It ended up quite scary, and if we were&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E L Frederick &#38;#38;#187; STOP The ACLU Blogburst 03.13.06</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45072</link>
		<dc:creator>E L Frederick &#38;#38;#187; STOP The ACLU Blogburst 03.13.06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 13:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45072</guid>
		<description>[...] Since the 5th amendment is pretty much already gone under judicial tyranny, one of the first things you can kiss goodbye is the 2nd amendment. The U.N. are already pushing for international gun control laws, and you can bet the ACLU won&#38;#8217;t fight against that. ACLU POLICY “The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court’s long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individual’s right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms.” –Policy #47 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since the 5th amendment is pretty much already gone under judicial tyranny, one of the first things you can kiss goodbye is the 2nd amendment. The U.N. are already pushing for international gun control laws, and you can bet the ACLU won&#38;#38;#8217;t fight against that. ACLU POLICY “The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court’s long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individual’s right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms.” –Policy #47 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45071</link>
		<dc:creator>Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45071</guid>
		<description>[...] Since the 5th amendment is pretty much already gone under judicial tyranny, one of the first things you can kiss goodbye is the 2nd amendment. The U.N. are already pushing for international gun control laws, and you can bet the ACLU won&#38;#8217;t fight against that. ACLU POLICY “The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court’s long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individual’s right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms.” –Policy #47 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since the 5th amendment is pretty much already gone under judicial tyranny, one of the first things you can kiss goodbye is the 2nd amendment. The U.N. are already pushing for international gun control laws, and you can bet the ACLU won&#38;#38;#8217;t fight against that. ACLU POLICY “The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court’s long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment [as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller] that the individual’s right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms.” –Policy #47 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KERWIN</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45066</link>
		<dc:creator>KERWIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45066</guid>
		<description>It sounds like a good way to protest the Highland Clearances that were probably a the main reason for the eminent domain clause in the Fifth Amendment.  The Highland Clearances happened when landlords decided that it was more profitable to herd sheep than rent the land.  So the Scottish people who had lived on the land for centuries were given the boot and many came to the colonies which rebelled soon after.  As you sow so shall you reap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like a good way to protest the Highland Clearances that were probably a the main reason for the eminent domain clause in the Fifth Amendment.  The Highland Clearances happened when landlords decided that it was more profitable to herd sheep than rent the land.  So the Scottish people who had lived on the land for centuries were given the boot and many came to the colonies which rebelled soon after.  As you sow so shall you reap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuck On Stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45065</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuck On Stupid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 05:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45065</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Hotel Souter Becoming a Reality?&lt;/strong&gt;
	&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;Future site of &#38;#34;Hotel Lost Liberty&#38;#34;?&#38;nbsp;Justice Souter&#039;s home New Hampshire may become a hotel because of the Kelo Decision. From State College Centre Daily: A group opposed to a U.S. Supreme Court decision on eminent dom...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hotel Souter Becoming a Reality?</strong><br />
	&#38;#38;nbsp;&#38;#38;nbsp;&#38;#38;nbsp;Future site of &#38;#38;#34;Hotel Lost Liberty&#38;#38;#34;?&#38;#38;nbsp;Justice Souter&#8217;s home New Hampshire may become a hotel because of the Kelo Decision. From State College Centre Daily: A group opposed to a U.S. Supreme Court decision on eminent dom&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45067</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45067</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, according to the Kelo opininion these activists won&#039;t succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, according to the Kelo opininion these activists won&#8217;t succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45068</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45068</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Group Seeks Souter Eviction As Protest&lt;/strong&gt;
	Angered by a Supreme Court ruling that gave local governments more power to seize people&#38;#39;s home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Group Seeks Souter Eviction As Protest</strong><br />
	Angered by a Supreme Court ruling that gave local governments more power to seize people&#38;#38;#39;s home</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motormouth</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45069</link>
		<dc:creator>Motormouth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45069</guid>
		<description>Yep, never bite the hand that feeds ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, never bite the hand that feeds ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mild mannered reporter</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/comment-page-1/#comment-45070</link>
		<dc:creator>mild mannered reporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/21/eminent-domain-irony-activists-seek-to-evict-souter-from-home/#comment-45070</guid>
		<description>This is justice for a liberal Justice.  I wonder how Souter feels now about Eminent Domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is justice for a liberal Justice.  I wonder how Souter feels now about Eminent Domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
