<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Upholds Parental Notification Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:39:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bella</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/comment-page-1/#comment-44915</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/#comment-44915</guid>
		<description>If your minor daughter wanted liposuction, she would need your permission.  If she wanted a face lift, collagen injections, or BOTOX, she would need your permission.  These are all elective procedures.

	Abortion, except in the case of the rare case where child birth is detrimental to a woman, is elective surgery.  It is invasive surgery; as such, has potential dangers.  Minors should need parental consent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your minor daughter wanted liposuction, she would need your permission.  If she wanted a face lift, collagen injections, or BOTOX, she would need your permission.  These are all elective procedures.</p>
<p>	Abortion, except in the case of the rare case where child birth is detrimental to a woman, is elective surgery.  It is invasive surgery; as such, has potential dangers.  Minors should need parental consent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where's my Haldol?</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/comment-page-1/#comment-44914</link>
		<dc:creator>Where's my Haldol?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/#comment-44914</guid>
		<description>The SCOTUS didn&#039;t rule on this issue at all, they simply bounced it back to the circuit court. Funny how those liberal activist justices y&#039;all like to complain about so much didn&#039;t uphold the appeal, eh?

	Personally I&#039;d be more in favor of a straightforward consent requirement than this notification crap. I&#039;d certainly want to know if my daughter was having surgery of any kind. Simple notifcation, however, nothing more than an intimidationtactic; in N.H. and similar states, these girls can still seek abortions regardless of what their parents think.

	Finally, don&#039;t be a tool. There are often valid maternal health concerns where young pregnant women are involved, and to dismiss these with an offhanded comment about &quot;pro-abortion folks&quot; (who exist only in your mind, of course) undermines your entire post (what there is of it to undermine, anyway).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SCOTUS didn&#8217;t rule on this issue at all, they simply bounced it back to the circuit court. Funny how those liberal activist justices y&#8217;all like to complain about so much didn&#8217;t uphold the appeal, eh?</p>
<p>	Personally I&#8217;d be more in favor of a straightforward consent requirement than this notification crap. I&#8217;d certainly want to know if my daughter was having surgery of any kind. Simple notifcation, however, nothing more than an intimidationtactic; in N.H. and similar states, these girls can still seek abortions regardless of what their parents think.</p>
<p>	Finally, don&#8217;t be a tool. There are often valid maternal health concerns where young pregnant women are involved, and to dismiss these with an offhanded comment about &#8220;pro-abortion folks&#8221; (who exist only in your mind, of course) undermines your entire post (what there is of it to undermine, anyway).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/comment-page-1/#comment-44913</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/01/18/supreme-court-upholds-parental-notification-law/#comment-44913</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top court dodges abortion ruling&lt;/strong&gt;
	In a unanimous vote Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a lower court was wrong to str</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top court dodges abortion ruling</strong><br />
	In a unanimous vote Wednesday, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a lower court was wrong to str</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
