Comments on: Bush Defends Approving Secretive Eavesdropping

By: Polunatic

Polunatic — Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:23:53 +0000

“Many of the acts done by President Bush have protected us from other terrorist attacks, and too many people do not realize this.”

Ungrateful sots is what they are. If you’re not doing anything wrong, why should you care if anyone’s listening to your phone calls or monitoring the books you want to borrow from the library.

Rights are a codeword for allowing people to act outside of the accepted norm of this great Christian nation. The only real rights should be the right to keep our mouths shut and let the government take care of our best interests.

By: The Strata-Sphere

The Strata-Sphere — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:28:49 +0000

The Imploding Democrats
Harry Reid&#8217;s performance on Fox News Sunday is a classic example of the death throws of the Democrat Party in the US. He had to deal with three subjects and he looked so bad on all three I almost (emphasis on almost) felt sorry for him. He had…

By: christy

christy — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:04:54 +0000

There was absolutely NO law broken. If you read the law the ONLY time a warrant is needed is when they are tapping domestic to domestic conversations and e-mails.The converations they were montoring were all International.
Also 98% were people aho are NOT citizens so who cares. What was done does not even come close to going against the fourth amendment.Everything was done with in the law and Congress knew about it there was Judical oversite. So basicly it is a non issue

By: All Things Beautiful

All Things Beautiful — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 09:20:23 +0000

The President’s Week From Hell (OPEN THREAD)
The Presiadent gave a striong radio address this morning, live, not taped as is the usual practice:
“In the weeks following the terrorist attacks on our nation, I authorized the National Security Agency, consistent with U.S. law and the Constitution, …

By: Kevin Mark Smith

Kevin Mark Smith — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:09:12 +0000

Remember how RICO was used to prosecute abortion protesters? I fear that these tactics might get out of hand if given to the wrong people (Hillary).

By: Saftey Pin

Saftey Pin — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:57:54 +0000

“Many of the acts done by President Bush have protected us from other terrorist attacks, and too many people do not realize this.”

Since you appear to be an insider — what thwarted attacks were these?

By: Bryin Wreckage

Bryin Wreckage — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 05:16:35 +0000

Yep, the President orders and people accept the orders. Whatever happened to illegal orders being refused? “I vas only obeying orders.” Nice excuse, but it doesn’t wash in the post Nurenburg trials era.
Sad. Ethics are right out the window in the new Amerika. Can’t wait for civil war. It’s coming. It’s gonna be horrible. But it’s coming.

By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Are At War People

Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; We Are At War People — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:53:33 +0000

[...] Stop The ACLU Right Wing Nuthouse The Kellino Zone Sister Toldjah Small Town Veteran Pros &#38; Cons Say Anything Ace of Spades HQ Redstate California Conservative The Political Teen Mike&#8217;s America Technorati Tags: Bush Iraq War On Terror Wiretaps Filed in: War On Terror | No Comments &#187; [...]

By: Flopping Aces

Flopping Aces — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:48:24 +0000

We Are At War People
I&#8217;m really amazed at the idiocy on the left. We are at war people! Do you think it&#8217;s just plain ole&#8217; luck that we have not been attacked on our soil since 9/11? The real story about these wiretaps is the fact that the information…

By: The Right Nation

The Right Nation — Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:43:08 +0000

The Real Scandal
President Bush delivered a very tough radio address responding to the controversy over the New York Times report on National Security Agency surveillance. The gist, according to Byron York at National Review’s The Corner: the surveillance program is …