Alito Ad Anti ACLU
Posted on December 5, 2005
WASHINGTON — Today, Fidelis launched the first phase of an advertising campaign that celebrates America’s Judeo-Christian faith traditions and defends Judge Samuel Alito.
Fidelis President Joseph Cella stated: “This season is a special time when many Americans commemorate our Judeo-Christian faith traditions. So while we prepare for our celebrations and give thanks for our treasured religious freedom, we unfortunately have to prepare for those freedoms and people who defend them to be attacked by the ACLU and their allies.”
The initial phase of the campaign is a web-based commercial and advertisements with a planned radio phase to follow.
“On one front of the war on religious freedom we see liberal groups like People for the American Way and the Alliance for Justice willing to attack judicial nominees over their “deeply held” Catholic and Christian beliefs. On the other front, we see it when seasonal displays reflecting America’s Judeo-Christian heritage are attacked by the ACLU and others,” said Cella.
Following the nomination of Judge Alito, some are calling into question his Roman Catholic faith, how that might affect his rulings and how a so-called “Catholic majority” on the Supreme Court would influence the direction of the court. Liberal groups are also citing Judge Alito’s 1999 decision in ACLU v Schundler allowing a religious holiday display in front of the Jersey City, N.J. city hall that included a Christian Nativity scene and a Jewish Menorah as proof that Judge Alito would further erode their extreme version of the “wall of separation” between church and state.Source
Any judge that rules against the ACLU is a great judge.
» Filed Under News
Trackback URL
Comments
8 Responses to “Alito Ad Anti ACLU”
-
Affiliations
The Giants
-
Advertise
Donate
Our Store
Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
Stop the ACLU blogburst
-
More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
I’m getting sick of these idiots quoting that darn “Wall of Separation” quote from Jefferson. Need I remind them that the same man who penned the very first religious liberties guarantees in the Virginia Constitution and who also wrote those words mandated mandatory Christian Chapel services at the University of Virginia within a few years after the Bill of Rights was ratified?
“Congress” and, via the 14th Amendment, the State congresses, shall make no law, not some judge, public school teacher, or city council person. These activists have got to go, and if it’s on the back of a Catholic-dominated Supreme Court, so be it.
“Any judge that rules against the ACLU is a great judge.”
Thus summarizing perfectly the comprehensive, objective, bastard-stepchild variant of “analysis” that makes this site what it is. Such an ethos clashes beautifully with the marauding of straw-man positions held by the left, such as unqualified “wars” on all things Christian. (In case that one slipped under your radar: You think it’s okay to dismiss out-of-hand anything smacking of an opposing viewpoint — however valid — but absolutely wrong to oppose bald-faced and unconstitutional efforts on the part of Christians to demand special treatment.)
More Beaming Idiocy I see. No we don’t simply dismiss out of hand anything, but your quick to do so we see by your all to quick dimissal of the Any judge statement you quote. It is in fact a good thing when people in the wrong are told about it in no uncertain terms. The ACLU is wrong, point of fact, so whats your problem Liberal?? Tell us moonbat, how is it frigging absolutely wrong to oppose the actions of the likes of you and the ACLU when they violate our rights under the constitution?? Did this FACT slip under your radar little boy? Did the fact that there is NO seperation clause in the constitution somehow evade your meager intellect? Christians are not demanding anything more than their constitutional right to practice their religion where ever and when ever they deem fit be upheld. Or is that too simple for you to comprehend??
Beaming Visionary and other commies simply want the Constitution to be misinterpreted on a regular basis, or rewritten altogether. My guess is the latter. I love how practicing our religion is considered “special treatment.” I also love how idiots think that just because something is made public that it is government establishment. WRONG. The people that penned the establishment clause are the same people that paid taxpayer money to have The Ten Commandments in court houses. Christianity always flies in the face of liberal satanism and that pisses them off. They want a country where no one is allowed to be rich, no one has a right to religion, and the government takes care of everyone. Yet no one is accountable to anyone for anything. Wait, that sounds like Communist Russia!
Beaming Visionary the more that you and the commierebel write makes me hate the left even more, keep it up and makebe you will make me and some more who had the ACLU take physical action, which is probably the only thing these ignorant b – - – - – - ds will understand.
Sorry I should have typed hate the ACLU
apostle said,
“Comment by apostle on December 6th, 2005 @ 12:13 pm
Wait, that sounds like Communist Russia!”
The only difference, apostle, is that in Russia you are STILL allowed to say merry CHRISTMAS!!!
That goes for COMMUNIST CHINA too!!!
I NEVER thought I would see the day when people in communist countries had MORE religious freedom than America. Well, those days ARE HERE!!!
We need to TAKE, by force if necessary, those INALIENABLE RIGHTS back from the pukelitically (in)correct lefturd dhimmies.
I REALLY hope we get to do it by FORCE!!!!!
Yes you lefturds, I’m A RIGHT WING extremist, religious, carry(A BIG GUN) daily, vote at EVERY opportunity and I’M NOT ALONE!!!!!!!!! Beware of us.
Well said Daily.