ACLU Names New Chairman
Reprinted with full permission from Adam’s Blog
Washington-The ACLU named a new chairman today as it enter into its annual “war on small towns with limited budgets” season.
The new chairman, former Congressman “The Grinch” (D-Mount Crumpit) pledged to continue the ACLU’s attack on Christmas with renewed vigor.
Reporters for the mainstream media and members of the ACLU teared up as he explained how he was marginalized by all the Whos down in Whoville who (selfishly and without regard for other viewpoints) dared to like Christmas a lot, because he did not.
The Grinch pledged to move beyond manger scenes in the ACLU’s, seeking to stamp out the scourge of Who-hash and Roast Beast. The new Chairman said he planned a Christmas Eve protest that would make every member of the Religious Right cry “boo hoo.”
Email This
Posted by Ian on December 4, 2005 2:38 pm
» Filed Under Christmas, Humor
Trackback URL:
Comments
8 Responses to “ACLU Names New Chairman”

















Sounds as if they want to continue in their scumbag ways. We can only hope that this will back fire in their face.
Raven you should go over to stop the aclu. com and look what the new director of the ACLU is starting to do. What a crock.
Sorry I should have read more closely. I feel like what I probably am.
the aclu is the grinch that stole christmas. l send them a christmas card, l hope l “p o” them.
The Grinch pledged to move beyond manger scenes in the ACLU’s, seeking to stamp out the scourge of Who-hash and Roast Beast.
Yeah, because opposing government funding of religion is exactly like breaking into private homes and stealing all the Christmas supplies.
l send them a christmas card, l hope l “p o” them.
What a lovely sentiment. I’m sure Jesus would be pleased that you celebrate His birthday in an attempt to piss people off, because we all know that pissing people off is the true reason for the season.
jason, yeah and lam sure jesus is very please with the support that you provide to those that are trying to get rid of his birthday.
Jan, that’s quite a leap you make, equating opposition to taxpayer funding of overtly religious displays with wanting to get rid of Christmas. It’s akin to saying “I want to force you to buy me a drink. If you object, it means you want to bring back prohibition.”
Hey Jason, like I posted on a previous thread, you might want to inform Jefferson that using government money to convert Indians to Christianity is against the Constitution HE helped frame. I guess that’s also why Ben Franklin wanted to teach “the necessity of a public religion and the excellance of Christianity above all others.”