<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire Parental Notification Law Head to the SCOTUS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:01:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-41890</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/#comment-41890</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lisa, your dim witted [edited]&quot;

	&quot;You and the rest of upside down morons take common sense turn it on its head...&quot;

	&quot;I’m sure some femanazi like you knows what is best for rest of nations children.&quot;

	&quot;Here’s a concept for you [edited], stay out of my families business.&quot;

	&quot;Again simply common snese stupid, try it some time you might like it.&quot;

	You use pejorative terms very freely for a man whose command of his native tongue is faint to nonexistent. You may even be beyond satire.

	&quot;I have no rights?&quot;

	No rights? Where did I even come close to implying as much?

	&quot;Glad you don’t make the decisions in my house.&quot;

	Not as glad as I am.

	&quot;What the hell do you have against men anyway?&quot;

	Nothing. Why so paranoid?

	&quot;Are you fat and ugly? or perhaps your father abused you or something.&quot;

	An excellent response to the observations that 61% of Americans are against illegalizing abortion and that the New Hampshire law, whether it goes into effect or not, doesn&#039;t give parents the authority to bar their daughters from going through with elective terminations of pregnancy. Way to confront the issues, jarhead.

	&quot;Children aren’t adults, parents are and are supposed to be in control. Mom and Dad raise kids, including girls, best.

	&quot;Teen age girls (and boys) don’t make very good decisions.&quot;

	Absolutely. But this doesn&#039;t imply that legislating from the bench (which is precisely what any abortion countermeasures demand) is agreeable.

	&quot;Thats why parents are legally responsible for their welfare.&quot;

	Actually this is untrue, btu I haven&#039;t the time for an in-depth sociology lecture.

	&quot;And since my Wife and I are legally responsible for our children then it stands to reason we should have AUTHORITY over them.&quot;

	I&#039;m sure you won&#039;t be threatening to take away whoever won your city&#039;s Parent of the Year title in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lisa, your dim witted [edited]&#8221;</p>
<p>	&#8220;You and the rest of upside down morons take common sense turn it on its head&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>	&#8220;I’m sure some femanazi like you knows what is best for rest of nations children.&#8221;</p>
<p>	&#8220;Here’s a concept for you [edited], stay out of my families business.&#8221;</p>
<p>	&#8220;Again simply common snese stupid, try it some time you might like it.&#8221;</p>
<p>	You use pejorative terms very freely for a man whose command of his native tongue is faint to nonexistent. You may even be beyond satire.</p>
<p>	&#8220;I have no rights?&#8221;</p>
<p>	No rights? Where did I even come close to implying as much?</p>
<p>	&#8220;Glad you don’t make the decisions in my house.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Not as glad as I am.</p>
<p>	&#8220;What the hell do you have against men anyway?&#8221;</p>
<p>	Nothing. Why so paranoid?</p>
<p>	&#8220;Are you fat and ugly? or perhaps your father abused you or something.&#8221;</p>
<p>	An excellent response to the observations that 61% of Americans are against illegalizing abortion and that the New Hampshire law, whether it goes into effect or not, doesn&#8217;t give parents the authority to bar their daughters from going through with elective terminations of pregnancy. Way to confront the issues, jarhead.</p>
<p>	&#8220;Children aren’t adults, parents are and are supposed to be in control. Mom and Dad raise kids, including girls, best.</p>
<p>	&#8220;Teen age girls (and boys) don’t make very good decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Absolutely. But this doesn&#8217;t imply that legislating from the bench (which is precisely what any abortion countermeasures demand) is agreeable.</p>
<p>	&#8220;Thats why parents are legally responsible for their welfare.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Actually this is untrue, btu I haven&#8217;t the time for an in-depth sociology lecture.</p>
<p>	&#8220;And since my Wife and I are legally responsible for our children then it stands to reason we should have AUTHORITY over them.&#8221;</p>
<p>	I&#8217;m sure you won&#8217;t be threatening to take away whoever won your city&#8217;s Parent of the Year title in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John the Marine</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-41889</link>
		<dc:creator>John the Marine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/#comment-41889</guid>
		<description>Lisa, your dim witted [edited].  I have no rights?  Glad you don&#039;t make the decisions in my house.  What the hell do you have against men anyway? Are you fat and ugly? or perhaps your father abused you or something.  Children aren&#039;t adults, parents are and are supposed to be in control. Mom and Dad raise kids, including girls, best.  You and the rest of upside down morons take common sense turn it on its head and then call the rest of us nuts.  Oh, and I&#039;m sure some femanazi like you knows what is best for rest of nations children.  Here&#039;s a concept for you A-hole, stay out of my families business.  Teen age girls (and boys) don&#039;t make very good decisions.  Thats why parents are legally responsible for their welfare.  And since my Wife and I are legally responsible for our children then it stands to reason we should have AUTHORITY over them.  Again simply common sense stupid, try it some time you might like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa, your dim witted [edited].  I have no rights?  Glad you don&#8217;t make the decisions in my house.  What the hell do you have against men anyway? Are you fat and ugly? or perhaps your father abused you or something.  Children aren&#8217;t adults, parents are and are supposed to be in control. Mom and Dad raise kids, including girls, best.  You and the rest of upside down morons take common sense turn it on its head and then call the rest of us nuts.  Oh, and I&#8217;m sure some femanazi like you knows what is best for rest of nations children.  Here&#8217;s a concept for you A-hole, stay out of my families business.  Teen age girls (and boys) don&#8217;t make very good decisions.  Thats why parents are legally responsible for their welfare.  And since my Wife and I are legally responsible for our children then it stands to reason we should have AUTHORITY over them.  Again simply common sense stupid, try it some time you might like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-41888</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/#comment-41888</guid>
		<description>First, two things you retards should know. One is that nearly two-thirds of Americans don&#039;t want to see abortion made illegal. The other is that the New Hampshire law would only require parental notification, not parental consent. So even if the SCOTUS upholds it, parents won&#039;t have the authority to keep their daughters from going through with the procedure. This would cause a lot of family friction in some cases, but obviously wouldn&#039;t accomplish enough to keep you [edited] happy because it would hardly curb abortions.

	&quot;I guess no women have died from safe legal rare abortion.&quot;

	The death rate from legal abortion has dropped to around 1 in every 200,000. It&#039;s not difficult to find scads of procedures more dangerous than this. I&#039;m not pro-abortion, but the hysteria and cooking of numbers from the pro-lifers is tiresome. If I were headed into an abortion clinic and someone got in my face I&#039;d beat his [edited] dead.

	&quot;Like I said before, parents have no rights, husbands have no rights.&quot;

	Husbands? How many married women do you suppose go out and get abortions without their husbands&#039; knowledge? And why wouldn&#039;t the women&#039;s rights take priority anyway? Caveman.

	&quot;Parents have no control over whether their child has an abortion, but they do have control over whether or not their information is given to a military recruiter. Glad liberals have their priorities straight.&quot;

	At least liberals tend to possess a modicum of understanding and reading comprehension. You should retire from Internet message boards for a solid three years and make some effort to raise your social IQ into the mid-sixties or higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, two things you retards should know. One is that nearly two-thirds of Americans don&#8217;t want to see abortion made illegal. The other is that the New Hampshire law would only require parental notification, not parental consent. So even if the SCOTUS upholds it, parents won&#8217;t have the authority to keep their daughters from going through with the procedure. This would cause a lot of family friction in some cases, but obviously wouldn&#8217;t accomplish enough to keep you [edited] happy because it would hardly curb abortions.</p>
<p>	&#8220;I guess no women have died from safe legal rare abortion.&#8221;</p>
<p>	The death rate from legal abortion has dropped to around 1 in every 200,000. It&#8217;s not difficult to find scads of procedures more dangerous than this. I&#8217;m not pro-abortion, but the hysteria and cooking of numbers from the pro-lifers is tiresome. If I were headed into an abortion clinic and someone got in my face I&#8217;d beat his [edited] dead.</p>
<p>	&#8220;Like I said before, parents have no rights, husbands have no rights.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Husbands? How many married women do you suppose go out and get abortions without their husbands&#8217; knowledge? And why wouldn&#8217;t the women&#8217;s rights take priority anyway? Caveman.</p>
<p>	&#8220;Parents have no control over whether their child has an abortion, but they do have control over whether or not their information is given to a military recruiter. Glad liberals have their priorities straight.&#8221;</p>
<p>	At least liberals tend to possess a modicum of understanding and reading comprehension. You should retire from Internet message boards for a solid three years and make some effort to raise your social IQ into the mid-sixties or higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-41887</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/#comment-41887</guid>
		<description>Like I said before, parents have no rights, husbands have no rights. Parents have no control over whether their child has an abortion, but they do have control over whether or not their information is given to a military recruiter. Glad liberals have their priorities straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said before, parents have no rights, husbands have no rights. Parents have no control over whether their child has an abortion, but they do have control over whether or not their information is given to a military recruiter. Glad liberals have their priorities straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shari</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-41886</link>
		<dc:creator>shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/#comment-41886</guid>
		<description>I guess no women have died from   safe legal rare abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess no women have died from   safe legal rare abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-41885</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/#comment-41885</guid>
		<description>A legal abortion is a safer procedure than giving birth.

	How do you know the girl doesn&#039;t have abusive parents?

	What if the girl is afraid to tell her parents and instead gets an illegal abortion?  Legal abortions are safe procedures, illegal abortions are not.

	If the girls has good parents, she most likely would go to them for advice regardless of what the law is.  If I had a daughter, I would make sure she knew that she could talk to me about a serious problem like this without having anything to be afraid of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A legal abortion is a safer procedure than giving birth.</p>
<p>	How do you know the girl doesn&#8217;t have abusive parents?</p>
<p>	What if the girl is afraid to tell her parents and instead gets an illegal abortion?  Legal abortions are safe procedures, illegal abortions are not.</p>
<p>	If the girls has good parents, she most likely would go to them for advice regardless of what the law is.  If I had a daughter, I would make sure she knew that she could talk to me about a serious problem like this without having anything to be afraid of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSBG &#38;#38;#187; Capitol “Holiday Tree” Once Again Called “Christmas Tree”</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/comment-page-1/#comment-41884</link>
		<dc:creator>SSBG &#38;#38;#187; Capitol “Holiday Tree” Once Again Called “Christmas Tree”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 05:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/30/new-hampshire-parental-notification-law-head-to-the-scotus/#comment-41884</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted in Political, Christian at 5:27 am by ssbg by Jay on 11-29-05 @ 4:27 pm Filed under News, Christmas Washington Times House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert has told federal officials that the lighted, decorated tree on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol — known in recent years as the “Holiday Tree” — should be renamed the “Capitol Christmas Tree,” as it was called until the late 1990s. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted in Political, Christian at 5:27 am by ssbg by Jay on 11-29-05 @ 4:27 pm Filed under News, Christmas Washington Times House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert has told federal officials that the lighted, decorated tree on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol — known in recent years as the “Holiday Tree” — should be renamed the “Capitol Christmas Tree,” as it was called until the late 1990s. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
