<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resistance Mounting Against Alito</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abraham Simpson</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-41771</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham Simpson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/#comment-41771</guid>
		<description>So what you&#039;re saying is that you&#039;re shocked that Democrats aren&#039;t bending over backward to have a known right-winger Alito added to the SCOTUS. I guess this means that if a liberal candidate had been nominated, you would keep your reservations to yourself and expect the same of the conservatives in Congress? Riiiiiiight.

	&quot;We need someone on the bench who will not attempt to make law.&quot;

	What if someone on the bench attempts to make anti-abortion, anti-gay, or pro-gun laws? Or are those exempt from this standard?

	&quot;People think nothing of dropping the f-bomb in public, abortion on demand, children being taught sex ed despite parents’ approval, gay and lesbian lifestyles being portrayed as main stream, and a general degeneration of America.&quot;

	I think that by far the biggest shame is the failure of the American educational system. Now that everyone and his grandmother has a weblog, it&#039;s easy to see that two-thirds of U.S. citizens can&#039;t write, spell, or process information worth a good [edited]

	I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;d be opposed to children being taught the basics of human reproduction even when their parents approve, but whatever -- parents who are puritanically stupid enough to try to shield their teenagers from the realities of sex are free to pull them out of public school and stick them in one of the many backward Christian schools across the countryside.

	Also, though I don&#039;t partake myself, gay and lesbian &quot;lifestyles&quot; are in fact mainstream. The fraction of people who are queer in this country is higher than the fractionthat&#039;s Jewish; do you want all of the Jews to take their &quot;lifestyles&quot; and disappear too? Might it be time to quit nailing yourself in the &#039;nads wit your Bible and just let others whose doings don&#039;t affect you live as they will? And this, from someone writing on a site that claims to hate government interference with private matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re saying is that you&#8217;re shocked that Democrats aren&#8217;t bending over backward to have a known right-winger Alito added to the SCOTUS. I guess this means that if a liberal candidate had been nominated, you would keep your reservations to yourself and expect the same of the conservatives in Congress? Riiiiiiight.</p>
<p>	&#8220;We need someone on the bench who will not attempt to make law.&#8221;</p>
<p>	What if someone on the bench attempts to make anti-abortion, anti-gay, or pro-gun laws? Or are those exempt from this standard?</p>
<p>	&#8220;People think nothing of dropping the f-bomb in public, abortion on demand, children being taught sex ed despite parents’ approval, gay and lesbian lifestyles being portrayed as main stream, and a general degeneration of America.&#8221;</p>
<p>	I think that by far the biggest shame is the failure of the American educational system. Now that everyone and his grandmother has a weblog, it&#8217;s easy to see that two-thirds of U.S. citizens can&#8217;t write, spell, or process information worth a good [edited]</p>
<p>	I&#8217;m not sure why you&#8217;d be opposed to children being taught the basics of human reproduction even when their parents approve, but whatever &#8212; parents who are puritanically stupid enough to try to shield their teenagers from the realities of sex are free to pull them out of public school and stick them in one of the many backward Christian schools across the countryside.</p>
<p>	Also, though I don&#8217;t partake myself, gay and lesbian &#8220;lifestyles&#8221; are in fact mainstream. The fraction of people who are queer in this country is higher than the fractionthat&#8217;s Jewish; do you want all of the Jews to take their &#8220;lifestyles&#8221; and disappear too? Might it be time to quit nailing yourself in the &#8216;nads wit your Bible and just let others whose doings don&#8217;t affect you live as they will? And this, from someone writing on a site that claims to hate government interference with private matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apu the Shopkeeper</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-41770</link>
		<dc:creator>Apu the Shopkeeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/#comment-41770</guid>
		<description>So what you&#039;re saying is that you&#039;re shocked that Democrats aren&#039;t bending over backward to have a known right-winger Alito added to the SCOTUS. I guess this means that if a liberal candidate had been nominated, you would keep your reservations to yourself and expect the same of the conservatives in Congress? Riiiiiiight.

	&quot;We need someone on the bench who will not attempt to make law.&quot;

	What if someone on the bench attempts to make anti-abortion, anti-gay, or pro-gun laws? Or are those exempt from this standard?

	&quot;People think nothing of dropping the f-bomb in public, abortion on demand, children being taught sex ed despite parents’ approval, gay and lesbian lifestyles being portrayed as main stream, and a general degeneration of America.&quot;

	I think that by far the biggest shame is the failure of the American educational system. Now that everyone and his grandmother has a weblog, it&#039;s easy to see that two-thirds of U.S. citizens can&#039;t write, spell, or process information worth a good [edited]

	I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;d be opposed to children being taught the basics of human reproduction even when their parents approve, but whatever -- parents who are puritanically stupid enough to try to shield their teenagers from the realities of sex are free to pull them out of public school and stick them in one of the many backward-ass Christian schools across the countryside.


	Also, though I don&#039;t partake myself, gay and lesbian &quot;lifestyles&quot; are in fact mainstream. The fraction of people who are queer in this country is higher than the fractionthat&#039;s Jewish; do you want all of the Jews to take their &quot;lifestyles&quot; and disappear too? Might it be time to quit nailing yourself in the &#039;nads wit your Bible and just let others whose doings don&#039;t affect you live as they will? And this, from someone writing on a site that claims to hate government interference with private matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re saying is that you&#8217;re shocked that Democrats aren&#8217;t bending over backward to have a known right-winger Alito added to the SCOTUS. I guess this means that if a liberal candidate had been nominated, you would keep your reservations to yourself and expect the same of the conservatives in Congress? Riiiiiiight.</p>
<p>	&#8220;We need someone on the bench who will not attempt to make law.&#8221;</p>
<p>	What if someone on the bench attempts to make anti-abortion, anti-gay, or pro-gun laws? Or are those exempt from this standard?</p>
<p>	&#8220;People think nothing of dropping the f-bomb in public, abortion on demand, children being taught sex ed despite parents’ approval, gay and lesbian lifestyles being portrayed as main stream, and a general degeneration of America.&#8221;</p>
<p>	I think that by far the biggest shame is the failure of the American educational system. Now that everyone and his grandmother has a weblog, it&#8217;s easy to see that two-thirds of U.S. citizens can&#8217;t write, spell, or process information worth a good [edited]</p>
<p>	I&#8217;m not sure why you&#8217;d be opposed to children being taught the basics of human reproduction even when their parents approve, but whatever &#8212; parents who are puritanically stupid enough to try to shield their teenagers from the realities of sex are free to pull them out of public school and stick them in one of the many backward-ass Christian schools across the countryside.</p>
<p>	Also, though I don&#8217;t partake myself, gay and lesbian &#8220;lifestyles&#8221; are in fact mainstream. The fraction of people who are queer in this country is higher than the fractionthat&#8217;s Jewish; do you want all of the Jews to take their &#8220;lifestyles&#8221; and disappear too? Might it be time to quit nailing yourself in the &#8216;nads wit your Bible and just let others whose doings don&#8217;t affect you live as they will? And this, from someone writing on a site that claims to hate government interference with private matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dethanial</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-41769</link>
		<dc:creator>Dethanial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 03:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/#comment-41769</guid>
		<description>If I am correct, Bush has slightly more than 3 years as president.  Do the democrats think he is going to nominate an immoral judge during that time.  I guess they want to filibuster for 3 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I am correct, Bush has slightly more than 3 years as president.  Do the democrats think he is going to nominate an immoral judge during that time.  I guess they want to filibuster for 3 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-41768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/28/resistance-mounting-against-alito/#comment-41768</guid>
		<description>It looks like they are going to be pulling out all their ammo eventually.  I can&#039;t wait for the final showdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like they are going to be pulling out all their ammo eventually.  I can&#8217;t wait for the final showdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
