<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Hits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/22/quick-hits-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/22/quick-hits-2/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/22/quick-hits-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41415</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/22/quick-hits-2/#comment-41415</guid>
		<description>Funny. And kinda related. Ran across this tongue-in-cheek comment at Jerry Pournelle&#039;s today:

	&quot;The comparisons of Linux to Wikipedia are amusing, when you carry them over to the Intelligent Design debate. Linux has, ultimately, a single designer who oversees every aspect of the creation. Wikipedia is done by an infinite number of monkeys with typewriters. Linux is stable, powerful, and a viable alternative to professionally-developed software. Wikipedia is a bad joke.

	Obviously I&#039;m not trying to argue that the success of Linux is an argument in favor of Intelligent Design, but it&#039;s still ironic.&quot; —Mike Powers

	I think Mike may be on to something...

	;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny. And kinda related. Ran across this tongue-in-cheek comment at Jerry Pournelle&#8217;s today:</p>
<p>	&#8220;The comparisons of Linux to Wikipedia are amusing, when you carry them over to the Intelligent Design debate. Linux has, ultimately, a single designer who oversees every aspect of the creation. Wikipedia is done by an infinite number of monkeys with typewriters. Linux is stable, powerful, and a viable alternative to professionally-developed software. Wikipedia is a bad joke.</p>
<p>	Obviously I&#8217;m not trying to argue that the success of Linux is an argument in favor of Intelligent Design, but it&#8217;s still ironic.&#8221; —Mike Powers</p>
<p>	I think Mike may be on to something&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.stoptheaclu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Politicker</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/22/quick-hits-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41414</link>
		<dc:creator>The Politicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/22/quick-hits-2/#comment-41414</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christmas Lights Gone Wild!&lt;/strong&gt;
	I found this at engadget via Stop The ACLU. Simply amazing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christmas Lights Gone Wild!</strong><br />
	I found this at engadget via Stop The ACLU. Simply amazing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

