<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Wants 9th Circuit to Re-Consider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:27:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nothing &#38;#38;#187; Judicial Usurpation of the State, Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40901</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing &#38;#38;#187; Judicial Usurpation of the State, Anyone?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 23:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40901</guid>
		<description>[...] Original link here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original link here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nisaba</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40900</link>
		<dc:creator>Nisaba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40900</guid>
		<description>Pointing out that &quot;320 senators&quot; agreed on the ruling is a complete non sequitur (not to mention that are only 2 senators per state for a total of 100 overall; this bill was passed by the House).  There are innumerable things in this country&#039;s past which the majority of legislators seemed to agree on and since apologized for.  Even the Pope admits the Vatican acted wrongly sometimes.  For decades, the House and Senate continued to stymie civil rights legislation that every one of us—not just minorities—benefits from today.  In a democratic nation, we get to disagree with our political representation even when they are united.

	In the same vein, responding to the question of where in the Constitution parental rights are by questioning where reproductive rights are in the Constitution is a blatant way to avoid answering the question.  If you cannot defend your view with rational arguments and your only response to being questioned on it is to attack the other side, perhaps you should rethink your view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pointing out that &#8220;320 senators&#8221; agreed on the ruling is a complete non sequitur (not to mention that are only 2 senators per state for a total of 100 overall; this bill was passed by the House).  There are innumerable things in this country&#8217;s past which the majority of legislators seemed to agree on and since apologized for.  Even the Pope admits the Vatican acted wrongly sometimes.  For decades, the House and Senate continued to stymie civil rights legislation that every one of us—not just minorities—benefits from today.  In a democratic nation, we get to disagree with our political representation even when they are united.</p>
<p>	In the same vein, responding to the question of where in the Constitution parental rights are by questioning where reproductive rights are in the Constitution is a blatant way to avoid answering the question.  If you cannot defend your view with rational arguments and your only response to being questioned on it is to attack the other side, perhaps you should rethink your view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Last Blog Standing::MattWallace.net</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40899</link>
		<dc:creator>Last Blog Standing::MattWallace.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40899</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sound bites not substantive in Fields v Palmdale School District&lt;/strong&gt;
	Via Michelle Malkin to this post is the story of USHR condemnation of the ruling in Fields v Palmdale School District. I don&#039;t much like the public school system, and I&#039;ll admit it. First, most public schools have class sizes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sound bites not substantive in Fields v Palmdale School District</strong><br />
	Via Michelle Malkin to this post is the story of USHR condemnation of the ruling in Fields v Palmdale School District. I don&#8217;t much like the public school system, and I&#8217;ll admit it. First, most public schools have class sizes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40898</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40898</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;9th Circus Court&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU While we mainly focus on the ACLU over at Stop The ACLU,we feel obligated to keep everyone aware of other issues as well, especially judicial activism. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is one of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>9th Circus Court</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU While we mainly focus on the ACLU over at Stop The ACLU,we feel obligated to keep everyone aware of other issues as well, especially judicial activism. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is one of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Museum of Left Wing Lunacy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40897</link>
		<dc:creator>The Museum of Left Wing Lunacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40897</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The 9th Circus Court&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU While we mainly focus on the ACLU over at Stop The ACLU,we feel obligated to keep everyone aware of other issues as well, especially judicial activism. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is one of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The 9th Circus Court</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU While we mainly focus on the ACLU over at Stop The ACLU,we feel obligated to keep everyone aware of other issues as well, especially judicial activism. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is one of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.M.</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40896</link>
		<dc:creator>E.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40896</guid>
		<description>Michael is right. The ruling may have been unpopular, but it was kicked back where it belonged. It was why the Supreme Court refused to hear it. Its considering the right of a parent to bring a cause of action in federal court. Here there isn&#039;t one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael is right. The ruling may have been unpopular, but it was kicked back where it belonged. It was why the Supreme Court refused to hear it. Its considering the right of a parent to bring a cause of action in federal court. Here there isn&#8217;t one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40895</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40895</guid>
		<description>loboninok - “But then I couldn’t find any reason for the Federal Government to have a Department of Education, either&quot;-- Not only is there no reason to have a federal department of education, but I believe that such oversight is dangerous</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loboninok &#8211; “But then I couldn’t find any reason for the Federal Government to have a Department of Education, either&#8221;&#8211; Not only is there no reason to have a federal department of education, but I believe that such oversight is dangerous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40894</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40894</guid>
		<description>Jay- The resolution came from Representatives...  Not from the Sentate... And they are &quot;wrong&quot;...  They are pandering to the masses...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay- The resolution came from Representatives&#8230;  Not from the Sentate&#8230; And they are &#8220;wrong&#8221;&#8230;  They are pandering to the masses&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Woolgar</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40893</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Woolgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40893</guid>
		<description>HI!
	   Loss of parental controls on sex  is but one little side of the California child total control problem. For this I refer you toThe Teaching Guide, &quot;ISLAM AND THE MUSLIMS&quot;  I have a copy of the 3rd edition of it. C@ 1995.There are newer editions of it. Their web site is, www.cie.org. It is approved by both the Council on Islamic Education and CAIR.
	 This imressionable children are openly taught, while teaching of any other religion or the names of Christian and Jewish deities and Prophets is proscribed by the ??constitutional requirements of total seperation of Church and state??
	    This guide promotes the teaching and practices of Islam and their prophet Muhammed.
	  Children in the K-12 grades are openly taught Arabic Church (Mosque practices,e.g. How to align your prayer rug and how to pray towards Makkah 5 times a day.
	    The text goes on to whitewash all of the negative things included and taught in the Quran.
	    This teaching guide tells the young how great Islam is and how to dresss properly and all of the peaceful and other wonderful things done by Islam over the years. It s a wonder because All things of and about Judaism and Christianity are not allowed in public schools even Christmas and New years are just winter holidays and Easter /Passover are now just spring break. But Islam and Allah  are the greatest. Allahu Hackbar!!
	    All this and more are done in the public schools. Parents have no right to expect any legal allowances of their rights in a public education enviornment.  This very serious error may well be a source of home grown terrorists within the next 12 years.
	 Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI!<br />
	   Loss of parental controls on sex  is but one little side of the California child total control problem. For this I refer you toThe Teaching Guide, &#8220;ISLAM AND THE MUSLIMS&#8221;  I have a copy of the 3rd edition of it. C@ 1995.There are newer editions of it. Their web site is, <a href="http://www.cie.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cie.org</a>. It is approved by both the Council on Islamic Education and CAIR.<br />
	 This imressionable children are openly taught, while teaching of any other religion or the names of Christian and Jewish deities and Prophets is proscribed by the ??constitutional requirements of total seperation of Church and state??<br />
	    This guide promotes the teaching and practices of Islam and their prophet Muhammed.<br />
	  Children in the K-12 grades are openly taught Arabic Church (Mosque practices,e.g. How to align your prayer rug and how to pray towards Makkah 5 times a day.<br />
	    The text goes on to whitewash all of the negative things included and taught in the Quran.<br />
	    This teaching guide tells the young how great Islam is and how to dresss properly and all of the peaceful and other wonderful things done by Islam over the years. It s a wonder because All things of and about Judaism and Christianity are not allowed in public schools even Christmas and New years are just winter holidays and Easter /Passover are now just spring break. But Islam and Allah  are the greatest. Allahu Hackbar!!<br />
	    All this and more are done in the public schools. Parents have no right to expect any legal allowances of their rights in a public education enviornment.  This very serious error may well be a source of home grown terrorists within the next 12 years.<br />
	 Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loboinok</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/comment-page-1/#comment-40892</link>
		<dc:creator>loboinok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/17/house-wants-9th-circuit-to-re-consider/#comment-40892</guid>
		<description>Michael

	 &quot;But then I couldn’t find any reason for the Federal Government to have a Department of Education, either.&quot;

	I have stated the same in the form of a question,numerous times. I have yet to recieve an answer... what say you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael</p>
<p>	 &#8220;But then I couldn’t find any reason for the Federal Government to have a Department of Education, either.&#8221;</p>
<p>	I have stated the same in the form of a question,numerous times. I have yet to recieve an answer&#8230; what say you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
