Sure, Jude. Join right up with the loony Democrats. The investigation isn’t over until they find what they’re looking for. And if they can’t find the evidence they want, they’ll just make it up, right?

And Jude, I’m sorry that you’re disappointed that the Iraqi’s didn’t obtain nuclear weapons. I guess you would be much happier if they had nukes. Perhaps you’d support the US just giving them some damn nukes so they could further destablize the region and lead us right into WW III, wouldn’t you?

I have a few other questions as well…

No blood for oil!
Halliburton!
Bush lies men die!
No WMD!

And all the rest. thoroughly debunked and for a long time now.

Those who don’t wish to see it; well they’ve got their heads in the sand. But there’s no way in hell that we should give into the likes of–the Revolutionary Communist Party whose November 2 campaign was “Drive out the Bush Regime” and all the other commie groups who side with the terrorists simply because they hate capitalism.

They don’t realize that half of them or even more than that–would be murdered by the islamofascists for not converting to Islam.

So really, they’re just feeding the alligator so it will eat them last.

http://www.parrotcheck.com/photos/truthbetold.jpg

…They also know that intelligence agencies from around the world agreed with our assessment of Saddam Hussein.
This is, of course, and echo of what Dick Cheney said in January 2004 [Note: Since Bush has emphatically stated that he DOES NOT read newspapers, I’m not implying that he stole the idea from Dick) :

”The reporting that we had prior to the war … basically said that he had a chemical, biological and nuclear program, and estimated that if he could acquire fissile material, he could have a nuclear weapon within a year or two. Based on that there wasn’t any way the administration could ignore those findings of the intelligence community in terms of thinking about the threat that Saddam Hussein represented.”
Yeah! You tell ‘em, Dick! Oh, but maybe you should also tell ‘em that what that report actually said was that the Iraqis could acquire nuclear bombs, but that it would most likely take them four to six years to do so. The only way that the one or two year scenario would be plausible would be if the Iraqis were able to acquire fissile material on the black market and that would be highly unlikely, since they’d tried since the 1970’s and filed each time.

Sweet and Sour Jesus on an open-faced bun, Dick, you should be more careful! By stressing the unlikely one-to-two-year scenario over the much, much more plausible four-to-six-year scenario it kinda looks like you manipulated intelligence in an attempt to deceive the American public. And nobody, and I mean NOBODY, likes a fibber!