Comments on: A Historic Example of Judicial Activism http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:22:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » How To Rewrite History http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/comment-page-1/#comment-40213 Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » How To Rewrite History Sat, 12 Nov 2005 16:37:22 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/#comment-40213 [...] This speech is only the latest example. The ACLU has made rewriting history an artform through judicial activism. They have completely rewritten the Constititution, and the Courts have helped them every step of the way. The Cantwell case is a prime example. [...] [...] This speech is only the latest example. The ACLU has made rewriting history an artform through judicial activism. They have completely rewritten the Constititution, and the Courts have helped them every step of the way. The Cantwell case is a prime example. [...]

]]> By: Daniel Levesque http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/comment-page-1/#comment-40212 Daniel Levesque Sat, 12 Nov 2005 09:21:22 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/#comment-40212 "It is an undisputed fact that the framers of our Constitution intended religious freedom issues to be left to the states." How I wish this were true today. If it were then the Supreme court, indeed, the district appeals courts, would refuse to hear cases involving Seperation of Church and State on the grounds that it is a state issue. Theunfortunate truth of the day is that, under revisionist history and the false concept that the Constitution is a "living document" religion has become a federally regulated enterprise. I wonder how far the courts will be allowed to go before the people stand up and demand they quit regulating religion under "Seperation of Church and State"? Soon, I hope. www.ravingconservative.com “It is an undisputed fact that the framers of our Constitution intended religious freedom issues to be left to the states.”

How I wish this were true today. If it were then the Supreme court, indeed, the district appeals courts, would refuse to hear cases involving Seperation of Church and State on the grounds that it is a state issue. Theunfortunate truth of the day is that, under revisionist history and the false concept that the Constitution is a “living document” religion has become a federally regulated enterprise.

I wonder how far the courts will be allowed to go before the people stand up and demand they quit regulating religion under “Seperation of Church and State”? Soon, I hope.

http://www.ravingconservative.com

]]> By: Kerwin http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/comment-page-1/#comment-40211 Kerwin Sat, 12 Nov 2005 08:34:14 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/#comment-40211 You might want to go back further to Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes a hero of the Progressive and labor movements. He preached the legal positism theory of law which is that all laws are made by human beings as opposed to nature or God and that there is no inherent or necessary connection between law and morality. Then there is the legal communities unconstitutional theory of court law. Put that all together and you have the present mess. You might want to go back further to Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes a hero of the Progressive and labor movements. He preached the legal positism theory of law which is that all laws are made by human beings as opposed to nature or God and that there is no inherent or necessary connection between law and morality. Then there is the legal communities unconstitutional theory of court law. Put that all together and you have the present mess.

]]> By: loboinok http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/comment-page-1/#comment-40210 loboinok Sat, 12 Nov 2005 05:45:39 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/#comment-40210 God given rights people! God given. No people,court or government can take them away. If you want to surrender them...thats another matter...as for me and my house... God given rights people! God given.
No people,court or government can take them away.
If you want to surrender them…thats another matter…as for me and my house…

]]> By: Jay http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/comment-page-1/#comment-40209 Jay Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:53:46 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/#comment-40209 I live in on base housing, would it be a violation of the seperation of church and state if I put up a nativity scene in the yard? I mean, its not really my yard, its the government's property. If they allowed it, would they be endorsing it? I live in on base housing, would it be a violation of the seperation of church and state if I put up a nativity scene in the yard? I mean, its not really my yard, its the government’s property. If they allowed it, would they be endorsing it?

]]> By: Big Dog http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/comment-page-1/#comment-40208 Big Dog Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:51:47 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/#comment-40208 What do you suppose they will do if someone (ACLU) questions a church being on a military base? What do you suppose they will do if someone (ACLU) questions a church being on a military base?

]]> By: kender http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/comment-page-1/#comment-40207 kender Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:41:43 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/11/a-historic-example-of-judicial-activism/#comment-40207 When teh revolution comes, lawyers, judges and pols will be the first against the wall. When teh revolution comes, lawyers, judges and pols will be the first against the wall.

]]>