<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYCLU: DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Intelligence Agency &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: a legacy of hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39676</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Intelligence Agency &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: a legacy of hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39676</guid>
		<description>[...] In case you haven&#38;#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is fed up with is hypocrisy and the ACLU is full of it. Purging the ACLU of its hypocrisy is bound to be a goliath task. Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. The ACLU have fought tooth and nail against the Bush administration&#38;#8217;s NSA program, a program designed to track international phone calls being made to or from suspected terrorist organizations. They have hailed themselves defenders of the right to privacy and labelled the program an illegal &#38;#8220;secret&#38;#8221; program of &#38;#8220;domestic spying&#38;#8221;. All the while the ACLU has its own &#38;#8220;secret &#38;#8221; program of domestic spying of its own members and their personal financial information. This program has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with the real bottom line of fundraising. Former ACLU board member Michael Myers was shocked at this discovery. The American Civil Liberties Union is using sophisticated technology to collect a wide variety of information about its members and donors in a fund-raising effort that has ignited a bitter debate over its leaders&#38;#8217; commitment to privacy rights. Some board members say the extensive data collection makes a mockery of the organization&#38;#8217;s frequent criticism of banks, corporations and government agencies for their practice of accumulating data on people for marketing and other purposes. The group&#38;#8217;s new data collection practices were implemented without the board&#38;#8217;s approval or knowledge and were in violation of the ACLU&#38;#8217;s privacy policy at the time, according to Michael Meyers, vice president of the organization and a frequent internal critic. He said he had learned about the new research by accident Nov. 7 during a meeting of the committee that is organizing the group&#38;#8217;s Biennial Conference in July. He objected to the practices, and the next day, the privacy policy on the group&#38;#8217;s Web site was changed. &#38;#8220;They took out all the language that would show that they were violating their own policy,&#38;#8221; Meyers said. &#38;#8220;In doing so, they sanctified their procedure while still keeping it secret.&#38;#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In case you haven&#38;#38;#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is fed up with is hypocrisy and the ACLU is full of it. Purging the ACLU of its hypocrisy is bound to be a goliath task. Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. The ACLU have fought tooth and nail against the Bush administration&#38;#38;#8217;s NSA program, a program designed to track international phone calls being made to or from suspected terrorist organizations. They have hailed themselves defenders of the right to privacy and labelled the program an illegal &#38;#38;#8220;secret&#38;#38;#8221; program of &#38;#38;#8220;domestic spying&#38;#38;#8221;. All the while the ACLU has its own &#38;#38;#8220;secret &#38;#38;#8221; program of domestic spying of its own members and their personal financial information. This program has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with the real bottom line of fundraising. Former ACLU board member Michael Myers was shocked at this discovery. The American Civil Liberties Union is using sophisticated technology to collect a wide variety of information about its members and donors in a fund-raising effort that has ignited a bitter debate over its leaders&#38;#38;#8217; commitment to privacy rights. Some board members say the extensive data collection makes a mockery of the organization&#38;#38;#8217;s frequent criticism of banks, corporations and government agencies for their practice of accumulating data on people for marketing and other purposes. The group&#38;#38;#8217;s new data collection practices were implemented without the board&#38;#38;#8217;s approval or knowledge and were in violation of the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s privacy policy at the time, according to Michael Meyers, vice president of the organization and a frequent internal critic. He said he had learned about the new research by accident Nov. 7 during a meeting of the committee that is organizing the group&#38;#38;#8217;s Biennial Conference in July. He objected to the practices, and the next day, the privacy policy on the group&#38;#38;#8217;s Web site was changed. &#38;#38;#8220;They took out all the language that would show that they were violating their own policy,&#38;#38;#8221; Meyers said. &#38;#38;#8220;In doing so, they sanctified their procedure while still keeping it secret.&#38;#38;#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nation &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39675</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nation &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39675</guid>
		<description>[...] In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right on the Right &#38;#38;#187; ACLU- A Legacy of Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39677</link>
		<dc:creator>Right on the Right &#38;#38;#187; ACLU- A Legacy of Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39677</guid>
		<description>[...] In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39678</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39678</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Hypocrisy Files&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#039;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Hypocrisy Files</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop The ACLU &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s War Against National Security</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39674</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop The ACLU &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s War Against National Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39674</guid>
		<description>[...] Ok, so the ACLU says no profiled searches, and no random searches. What about searches across the board? Nope. Raymond James Stadium tried it, and the ACLU sued. So, where does that leave us with searches? I think we can conclude that the ACLU are against all searches. Is this because they stand by the principle of the fourth amendment? The irony and hypocrisy here is that, the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. Apparantly their war against searches is not based on principle. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ok, so the ACLU says no profiled searches, and no random searches. What about searches across the board? Nope. Raymond James Stadium tried it, and the ACLU sued. So, where does that leave us with searches? I think we can conclude that the ACLU are against all searches. Is this because they stand by the principle of the fourth amendment? The irony and hypocrisy here is that, the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. Apparantly their war against searches is not based on principle. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gribbit&#38;#38;#8217;s Word :: ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s Love of Terrorists :: November :: 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39673</link>
		<dc:creator>Gribbit&#38;#38;#8217;s Word :: ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s Love of Terrorists :: November :: 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39673</guid>
		<description>[...] Ok, so the ACLU says no profiled searches, and no random searches. What about searches across the board? Nope. Raymond James Stadium tried it, and the ACLU sued. So, where does that leave us with searches? I think we can conclude that the ACLU are against all searches. Is this because they stand by the principle of the fourth amendment? The irony and hypocrisy here is that, the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. Apparantly their war against searches is not based on principle. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ok, so the ACLU says no profiled searches, and no random searches. What about searches across the board? Nope. Raymond James Stadium tried it, and the ACLU sued. So, where does that leave us with searches? I think we can conclude that the ACLU are against all searches. Is this because they stand by the principle of the fourth amendment? The irony and hypocrisy here is that, the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. Apparantly their war against searches is not based on principle. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39672</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39672</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The ACLU&#039;s War on National Security&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU In conjunction with the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the ACLU has lobbied hard against Arab-profiling at airports for years. “Profiles are notoriously under-inclusive,” says ACLU legi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The ACLU&#8217;s War on National Security</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU In conjunction with the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the ACLU has lobbied hard against Arab-profiling at airports for years. “Profiles are notoriously under-inclusive,” says ACLU legi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Storage :: Top Ten Reasons to Stop The ACLU :: November :: 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39671</link>
		<dc:creator>News Storage :: Top Ten Reasons to Stop The ACLU :: November :: 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39671</guid>
		<description>[...] 4. The ACLU Opposes National Security. The ACLU have opposed almost every effort in the arena of national security. From the bird flu to bag searches, the ACLU have been against it. No matter what kind of search someone tries to do to protect people, the ACLU have proved they are against them across the board. Its kind of ironic that they don&#38;#8217;t practice the principles they preach. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4. The ACLU Opposes National Security. The ACLU have opposed almost every effort in the arena of national security. From the bird flu to bag searches, the ACLU have been against it. No matter what kind of search someone tries to do to protect people, the ACLU have proved they are against them across the board. Its kind of ironic that they don&#38;#38;#8217;t practice the principles they preach. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39670</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39670</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top Ten List of Why the ACLU needs to be Stopped&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Stop The ACLU was started on February 9th, 2004. We started with high hopes, and we realized we were facing a goliath. There were many reasons why we thought the ACLU needed to be countered,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top Ten List of Why the ACLU needs to be Stopped</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Stop The ACLU was started on February 9th, 2004. We started with high hopes, and we realized we were facing a goliath. There were many reasons why we thought the ACLU needed to be countered,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Museum of Left Wing Lunacy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/comment-page-1/#comment-39669</link>
		<dc:creator>The Museum of Left Wing Lunacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/11/06/nyclu-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comment-39669</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top Ten Reasons To Stop The ACLU&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Stop The ACLU was started on February 9th, 2004. We started with high hopes, and we realized we were facing a goliath. There were many reasons why we thought the ACLU needed to be countered,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top Ten Reasons To Stop The ACLU</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Stop The ACLU was started on February 9th, 2004. We started with high hopes, and we realized we were facing a goliath. There were many reasons why we thought the ACLU needed to be countered,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
