Jesse Jackson: Alito is Anti-Civil Rights

Posted on November 1, 2005

Hat tip: Blogs For Bush

When Rosa Parks refused to get up and let a white man have her seat, the white bus driver would not drive off. The white police officer arrested her. They were following the legal, political and religious edicts of their day. Rosa Parks was following a higher law, a moral imperative. If they would not have done their jobs, they would have lost their jobs. If she had not refused to get up, she would have lost her dignity.

There are those who will honor her now in the morning while working to overturn her legacy in the afternoon. President Bush honored her and then nominated Samuel Alito, a states’ rights, strict-constructionist throwback to a bygone age, to the Supreme Court. Alito is a “favorite” of the conservative right wing in the nation that has stood on the opposite side of history from Rosa Parks. His legal foundation is clearly adverse to civil rights, women’s right to self-determination and labor. He has even earned himself the nickname “Scalito,” after Justice Antonin Scalia, the court’s most radical reactionary.source

Expect to hear a lot more of this leftist foaming of the mouth in the months leading up to Confirmation. Don’t buy any of the B.S. The left are out to smear using whatever low life, shameless tacticts they can get their hands on. You will hear killing babies referred to as women’s rights, phrases such as Kennedy’s favorite, “turning back the clock on civil liberties”, and all sorts of other crap to make Alito out to look like a woman hating, racist thug ready to strip us all of our liberty. It will be fun to watch the left make complete fools of themselves, and interesting to watch the debate unfold to the American public.

For more hilliarious insanity from the left, check out Rightwing News’ Early Lefty-Blogger Reaction To The Alito Nomination In Quotes

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

» Filed Under News


Trackback URL

Comments

12 Responses to “Jesse Jackson: Alito is Anti-Civil Rights”

  1. Susie on November 1st, 2005 1:24 pm

    It’s so much fun to watch the meltdown!

  2. Jay on November 1st, 2005 1:26 pm

    Yes, I see why so many on the right wanted such a big fight now, it is fun to watch the lefties go even further into koo koo land.

  3. Ogre on November 1st, 2005 1:28 pm

    Oh, they’re so out there. This is a riot.

  4. jason on November 1st, 2005 2:01 pm

    What if he is a woman-hating, racist thug?

  5. christy on November 1st, 2005 2:49 pm

    Someone needs to Jesse that it is him and the likes of Al Sharpton
    that are the true slap in the face to what that woman stood for.

  6. epiphany on November 1st, 2005 2:57 pm

    He must be a darn fine pick, if the left is getting themselves worked up into this much of tissy. :D

  7. Jenny on November 1st, 2005 3:00 pm

    Oh, poor, poor Jesse. If he only had a brain…you know…to match the size of his big mouth!

  8. apostle on November 1st, 2005 3:22 pm

    If the left were so concerned with civil rights, and anti-racism, they’d shut up Jackson, remove BET from television, and Black History month would be history. You can’t shout racism everywhere and then turn around and alienate yourself from the rest of America. Newsflash to black activists: there is no black America, there is just America, you are either American or your not.

  9. Ben on November 1st, 2005 3:32 pm

    http://harshrealities.info/ben/?p=25

    The tragedy (Katrina) that has caused hundreds of thousands to seek refuge (i.e. to become a “refugee”) has become the personal grand-stand of a failed cleric, a tarnished man of the cloth. Jesse Jackson has proved himself to be nothing more than a publicity hound for years. It was not, however, until his adulterous relationship that produced an illigitmate child surfaced that people started realizing the sorry excuse for a man was nothing more than walking, talking hypocrisy.

    Why do we listen to this man? If you think we should listen to him because his skin is dark, then you are a racist.

    Now, he’s trying to re-define the English language in a situation that can only be said to be a grab for the limelight.

    Use of Word ‘Refugee’ Stirs Debate

    “It is racist to call American citizens refugees,” Jesse Jackson said, visiting the Houston Astrodome on Monday.

    This is the same man who grabbed the limelight when Clinton faced his charges of adultery (only to reveal his hypocrisy shortly thereafter).

    This is the same man who grabbed the limelight, using the cause of a a family trying to keep their brain-dead daughter’s body on life-support (Shiavo).

    This is the man who leapt up–-not to help, mind you–-but to grand-stand and stretch for the limelight yet again over the broken, drowned bodies of the tragic victims of Hurricane Katrina.

    Why do people listen to this walking insult? Why? Why?!

    “I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson practices, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution. Can I get an AMEN on that one?” –George Carlin

  10. David on November 1st, 2005 7:41 pm

    OK, I had a few reservations about Alito (nothing to make me go all “Harriet-Miers-loony-RIGHT-moonbat” over), but now, with Jesse’s “endorsement” I can unreservedly root for his confirmation.

  11. The Smoke Eater on November 1st, 2005 9:28 pm

    Here’s a question – would “the left” of Rosa Park’s day wanted an “activist judge” to overturn the “law of the day”? Since at the time, there were no “white, left wing leaders” calling for that? But, since when has a judge who is a “strict constructionist” said that “if the law says this, we do something else”?

  12. Dorothy on November 2nd, 2005 12:56 am

    Will someone please give Jesse an Enema, I think its time for Him to start seeing More Clearly..