<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Allows Inmate&#8217;s Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:59:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-38102</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/#comment-38102</guid>
		<description>I have yet to hear how our new chief justice voted - has anyone?Will we EVER know how Roberts voted? I too am disgusted with providing taxpayer funded bus trips to abortion clinics. Joeseph Mengele must be smiling from wherever he resides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to hear how our new chief justice voted &#8211; has anyone?Will we EVER know how Roberts voted? I too am disgusted with providing taxpayer funded bus trips to abortion clinics. Joeseph Mengele must be smiling from wherever he resides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MaryHunter</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-38101</link>
		<dc:creator>The MaryHunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/#comment-38101</guid>
		<description>Chris, my above comments notwithstanding: the &#039;abortion for convenience&#039; argument is not going to win any converts over here.

	Perhaps instead, we should look at the root cause, and therefore critique the leftist and permissive cultural mores in this nation that might have led her toward both (a) encarceration for a parole violation - how stupid is that? and (b) unwanted pregnancy - how avoidable is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, my above comments notwithstanding: the &#8216;abortion for convenience&#8217; argument is not going to win any converts over here.</p>
<p>	Perhaps instead, we should look at the root cause, and therefore critique the leftist and permissive cultural mores in this nation that might have led her toward both (a) encarceration for a parole violation &#8211; how stupid is that? and (b) unwanted pregnancy &#8211; how avoidable is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProLifeBlogs</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-38100</link>
		<dc:creator>ProLifeBlogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/#comment-38100</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;US Supreme Court Allows Abortion for Prisoner&lt;/strong&gt;
	HT Jay at Stop the ACLU. From LifeSiteNews: The US Supreme Court confirmed a lower court order granting a Missouri prisoner access to an abortion, despite a law that forbids state funds from being used to pay for the procedure....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>US Supreme Court Allows Abortion for Prisoner</strong><br />
	HT Jay at Stop the ACLU. From LifeSiteNews: The US Supreme Court confirmed a lower court order granting a Missouri prisoner access to an abortion, despite a law that forbids state funds from being used to pay for the procedure&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-38099</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/#comment-38099</guid>
		<description>Would you be against transporting this woman using tax payer funds to any other type of medical procdure? She is paying for the abortion so your tax dollars aren&#039;t doing it. Abortion is still legal so she isn&#039;t violating any laws. Just curious, if you forced her to have the baby how thirlled would you be to spend your tax dollars raising the child because that seems the liekly consequence. Might want to shell out the 300 bucks now instead of the hundreds of thousands it would cost over the next 18 years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you be against transporting this woman using tax payer funds to any other type of medical procdure? She is paying for the abortion so your tax dollars aren&#8217;t doing it. Abortion is still legal so she isn&#8217;t violating any laws. Just curious, if you forced her to have the baby how thirlled would you be to spend your tax dollars raising the child because that seems the liekly consequence. Might want to shell out the 300 bucks now instead of the hundreds of thousands it would cost over the next 18 years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-38098</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/#comment-38098</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Supreme Court halts prison abortion order&lt;/strong&gt;
	The U.S. Supreme Court late Friday temporarily blocked a federal judge?s ruling that ordered Missour</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Supreme Court halts prison abortion order</strong><br />
	The U.S. Supreme Court late Friday temporarily blocked a federal judge?s ruling that ordered Missour</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MaryHunter</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-38097</link>
		<dc:creator>The MaryHunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/17/court-allows-inmates-abortion/#comment-38097</guid>
		<description>Jay, what I&#039;d heard was that the abortion was not being paid for by the government but through other funds, and that the issue was that the state was going to provide transportation and security (and cover costs) for the inmate to go to the place to have the abortion.

	So, it is possible that this story is being misrepresented by a MSM too eager to trumpet a SCOTUS &#039;pro-abortion&#039; decision when it really was only &#039;pro-abortion&#039; on a technicality. In fact, I&#039;ve heard this also reported several times on the radio top and bottom hour news blurps as &quot;SCOTUS OK&#039;s abortion&quot; which grabs the ear but seems rather inaccurate.

	I&#039;d like to see more in-depth reporting on this story before I start losing confidence in this SCOTUS and Chief Justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, what I&#8217;d heard was that the abortion was not being paid for by the government but through other funds, and that the issue was that the state was going to provide transportation and security (and cover costs) for the inmate to go to the place to have the abortion.</p>
<p>	So, it is possible that this story is being misrepresented by a MSM too eager to trumpet a SCOTUS &#8216;pro-abortion&#8217; decision when it really was only &#8216;pro-abortion&#8217; on a technicality. In fact, I&#8217;ve heard this also reported several times on the radio top and bottom hour news blurps as &#8220;SCOTUS OK&#8217;s abortion&#8221; which grabs the ear but seems rather inaccurate.</p>
<p>	I&#8217;d like to see more in-depth reporting on this story before I start losing confidence in this SCOTUS and Chief Justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
