<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now Lets Bash Mrs. Bush!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Publius Rendezvous</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37572</link>
		<dc:creator>Publius Rendezvous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37572</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Exposing the Soft Underbelly&lt;/strong&gt;
	Personally, this seems to be that much more damning to this nomination and the hurdles President Bush has to overcome with his base. I find it incredibly dissapointing that this admission bears credence through someone as close as Rove to President B...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Exposing the Soft Underbelly</strong><br />
	Personally, this seems to be that much more damning to this nomination and the hurdles President Bush has to overcome with his base. I find it incredibly dissapointing that this admission bears credence through someone as close as Rove to President B&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Things Beautiful</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37571</link>
		<dc:creator>All Things Beautiful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37571</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The First Lady and Professor Althouse&lt;/strong&gt;
	Much contoversy has been placed yesterday on Laura Bush&#039;s stepping into the front line of defence of Harriet Miers, her husband&#039;s nominee for a Supreme Court vacancy. Speaking during a rare joint interview together with the President, on the NBC&#039;s T...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The First Lady and Professor Althouse</strong><br />
	Much contoversy has been placed yesterday on Laura Bush&#8217;s stepping into the front line of defence of Harriet Miers, her husband&#8217;s nominee for a Supreme Court vacancy. Speaking during a rare joint interview together with the President, on the NBC&#8217;s T&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Surber</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37570</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Surber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37570</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Malkin In The Middle&lt;/strong&gt;
	Stop the ACLU: &quot;Apparently it isn?t enough for the ?Coalition of the Illin? to bash GWB. It looks like they?ve decided to move on to Mrs. Bush now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Malkin In The Middle</strong><br />
	Stop the ACLU: &#8220;Apparently it isn?t enough for the ?Coalition of the Illin? to bash GWB. It looks like they?ve decided to move on to Mrs. Bush now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The M. Sheldon Show</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37569</link>
		<dc:creator>The M. Sheldon Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37569</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;I May Pay Dearly for This One&lt;/strong&gt;
	I am about to commit a few nearly unforgivable sins...at least as far as right-of-center bloggers go. I am calling some of my fellow bloggers&#039; recent irrationality and (apparent) developing hatred for our President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I May Pay Dearly for This One</strong><br />
	I am about to commit a few nearly unforgivable sins&#8230;at least as far as right-of-center bloggers go. I am calling some of my fellow bloggers&#8217; recent irrationality and (apparent) developing hatred for our President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Snitch!</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Snitch!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37568</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Michelle Malkin laps it up&lt;/strong&gt;
	Ms. Malkin&#039;s had the error pointed out to her, but rather than issue a retraction, she&#039;s standing by her overreaction. Michelle, that&#039;s not what being &quot;principled&quot; is about. That&#039;s just being too big for correction, something you admonish others ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Michelle Malkin laps it up</strong><br />
	Ms. Malkin&#8217;s had the error pointed out to her, but rather than issue a retraction, she&#8217;s standing by her overreaction. Michelle, that&#8217;s not what being &#8220;principled&#8221; is about. That&#8217;s just being too big for correction, something you admonish others &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#38;#38;#187; The Laura Bush &#38;#38;#8220;It&#38;#38;#8217;s Possible&#38;#38;#8221; Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37567</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#38;#38;#187; The Laura Bush &#38;#38;#8220;It&#38;#38;#8217;s Possible&#38;#38;#8221; Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37567</guid>
		<description>[...] Other bloggers thinking similarly: Bryan Preston, Jay at Stop the ACLU, Cao, Rob at Say Anything, AJStrata &#38;#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other bloggers thinking similarly: Bryan Preston, Jay at Stop the ACLU, Cao, Rob at Say Anything, AJStrata &#38;#38;#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah &#38;#38;#187; The Laura Bush &#38;#38;#8220;It&#38;#38;#8217;s Possible&#38;#38;#8221; Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37566</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah &#38;#38;#187; The Laura Bush &#38;#38;#8220;It&#38;#38;#8217;s Possible&#38;#38;#8221; Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37566</guid>
		<description>[...] Other bloggers thinking similarly: Bryan Preston , Jay at Stop the ACLU, Cao, Rob at Say Anything, AJStrata&#38;#8230;    By: Sister Toldjah in: Politics, Law/Judiciary &#124; Email this post &#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp;       Trackback URI for this post: http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/11/the-laura-bush-its-possible-controversy/trackback/ &#38;#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other bloggers thinking similarly: Bryan Preston , Jay at Stop the ACLU, Cao, Rob at Say Anything, AJStrata&#38;#38;#8230;    By: Sister Toldjah in: Politics, Law/Judiciary | Email this post &#38;#38;nbsp;&#38;#38;nbsp;       Trackback URI for this post: <a href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/11/the-laura-bush-its-possible-controversy/trackback/" rel="nofollow">http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2005/10/11/the-laura-bush-its-possible-controversy/trackback/</a> &#38;#38;#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pantheria</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37565</link>
		<dc:creator>pantheria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37565</guid>
		<description>Now why did she have to attack Mrs. Bush , she is the sweetest Lady that we have had in the white house since Martha washington





	well I guess malkin is just like the rest of those reporters  fickle , did she have nothing else to report and so she stoops to this .. its nausiating</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now why did she have to attack Mrs. Bush , she is the sweetest Lady that we have had in the white house since Martha washington</p>
<p>	well I guess malkin is just like the rest of those reporters  fickle , did she have nothing else to report and so she stoops to this .. its nausiating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donkey Stomp</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37564</link>
		<dc:creator>Donkey Stomp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37564</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Conservatives, Hold Your Fire!&lt;/strong&gt;
	Conservatives have been battling it out in regards to Supreme Court nominee, Harriet Miers. The battle has been heated as Republicans debate rather or not Miers is fit for the job. However, some of the &quot;debates&quot; are getting ugly. This...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Conservatives, Hold Your Fire!</strong><br />
	Conservatives have been battling it out in regards to Supreme Court nominee, Harriet Miers. The battle has been heated as Republicans debate rather or not Miers is fit for the job. However, some of the &#8220;debates&#8221; are getting ugly. This&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/comment-page-1/#comment-37563</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/11/now-lets-bash-mrs-bush/#comment-37563</guid>
		<description>JESUS.  Bush Derangement Syndrome???

	I can&#039;t believe how some of these people can stoop to &quot;With all due respect, perhaps Mrs. Bush should stick to telling horse jokes.&quot; rather than address the issue--with absolutely no sense of irony.  But! But! But the left does it, so I can too!

	And PLEASE, the only people who are talking seriously about sexism and Ms. Miers are the ones who are against her!  How the hell does &quot;I suppose it&#039;s possible&quot; mean she&#039;s &quot;pulling the sexism card?&quot;

	If I want a defense against the sexism (non)charge, the last people I&#039;m going to look to for it are the ones she listed.  Anti-Miers men?  Gimme a break!  How is that objective in the slightest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JESUS.  Bush Derangement Syndrome???</p>
<p>	I can&#8217;t believe how some of these people can stoop to &#8220;With all due respect, perhaps Mrs. Bush should stick to telling horse jokes.&#8221; rather than address the issue&#8211;with absolutely no sense of irony.  But! But! But the left does it, so I can too!</p>
<p>	And PLEASE, the only people who are talking seriously about sexism and Ms. Miers are the ones who are against her!  How the hell does &#8220;I suppose it&#8217;s possible&#8221; mean she&#8217;s &#8220;pulling the sexism card?&#8221;</p>
<p>	If I want a defense against the sexism (non)charge, the last people I&#8217;m going to look to for it are the ones she listed.  Anti-Miers men?  Gimme a break!  How is that objective in the slightest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
