Comments on: Attacking Jesus? Mt. Soledad Cross Unconstituional http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:59:58 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: The Right Track http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37336 The Right Track Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:26:53 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37336 <strong>Putting Atheism In Its Place</strong> Atheists, backed by the ACLU, are running up quite a track record against Christian symbols these days. A left-leaning judiciary helps them along. See the video below for my complete commentary. The following stories are referenced in the video: I... Putting Atheism In Its Place
Atheists, backed by the ACLU, are running up quite a track record against Christian symbols these days. A left-leaning judiciary helps them along. See the video below for my complete commentary.
The following stories are referenced in the video:

I…

]]> By: Freedom of Thought &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37335 Freedom of Thought &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:37:37 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37335 [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: &#8220;I placed my faith in the courts…&#8221; What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU&#8217;s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#8220;It still doesn&#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#8221; [...] [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: &#38;#8220;I placed my faith in the courts…&#38;#8221; What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU&#38;#8217;s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#38;#8220;It still doesn&#38;#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#38;#8221; [...]

]]> By: Stop The ACLU &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Interviews Alan Sears, President of the Alliance Defense Fund http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37334 Stop The ACLU &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Interviews Alan Sears, President of the Alliance Defense Fund Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:19:25 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37334 [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: “I placed my faith in the courts…” What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU’s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#8220;It still doesn&#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#8221; [...] [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: “I placed my faith in the courts…” What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU’s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#38;#8220;It still doesn&#38;#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#38;#8221; [...]

]]> By: Gribbit&#38;#8217;s Word :: Stop The ACLU&#38;#8217;s Interview With Alan Sears :: October :: 2005 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37333 Gribbit&#38;#8217;s Word :: Stop The ACLU&#38;#8217;s Interview With Alan Sears :: October :: 2005 Thu, 27 Oct 2005 05:08:49 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37333 [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: “I placed my faith in the courts…” What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU’s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#8220;It still doesn&#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#8221; [...] [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: “I placed my faith in the courts…” What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU’s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#38;#8220;It still doesn&#38;#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#38;#8221; [...]

]]> By: Conservative Thinking http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37332 Conservative Thinking Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:38:22 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37332 <strong>Stop The ACLU's Interview With Alan Sears</strong> Crossposted from Stop The ACLU First of all, I want to thank you on behalf of Stop The ACLU, all of our contributors, and supporters. It is an honor to have this interview with you. We appreciate the Alliance Defense... Stop The ACLU’s Interview With Alan Sears
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU First of all, I want to thank you on behalf of Stop The ACLU, all of our contributors, and supporters. It is an honor to have this interview with you. We appreciate the Alliance Defense…

]]> By: Real Teen- Right on the Right &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU- Special Interview http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37331 Real Teen- Right on the Right &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU- Special Interview Thu, 27 Oct 2005 04:25:10 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37331 [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: &#8220;I placed my faith in the courts…&#8221; What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU&#8217;s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#8220;It still doesn&#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#8221; [...] [...] 5. Recently a judge in California ruled that the Mt. Soledad cross was unconstitutional despite the majority of San Diego voters supported keeping the cross. What are your thoughts on judicial activism in America today? Should judges be using international law in interpreting the Constitution? In his biography by Peggy Lamson, Roger Baldwin said: &#38;#8220;I placed my faith in the courts…&#38;#8221; What he meant by that was that he knew the ACLU could not achieve its aims through state and federal legislatures or by taking their case to the people. He knew that the courts would be the most useful method of imposing the ACLU&#38;#8217;s agenda on the people. The outgrowth of that strategy is the judicial activism we see today, where the ACLU and its allies are using the courts to deny the expressed will of the people and to impose new laws via judicial fiat. In the Mt. Soledad case, the ACLU attorney James McElroy expressed his disdain for the majority when he said after the vote: &#38;#8220;It still doesn&#38;#8217;t mean a damn thing. Voters should have never voted on it.&#38;#8221; [...]

]]> By: killrighty.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU Blogburst http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37330 killrighty.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU Blogburst Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:34:14 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37330 [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 ( H.R . 2679 ) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, &#8220;The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.&#8221; [...] [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 ( H.R . 2679 ) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, &#38;#8220;The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.&#38;#8221; [...]

]]> By: Flopping Aces &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU Wackiness http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37329 Flopping Aces &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU Wackiness Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:14:38 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37329 [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 (H.R.2679) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, “The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.” [...] [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 (H.R.2679) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, “The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.” [...]

]]> By: The Wide Awakes &#38;#187; Stop Paying For The Secularization of America http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37328 The Wide Awakes &#38;#187; Stop Paying For The Secularization of America Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:01:14 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37328 [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 (H.R. 2679) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, &#8220;The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.&#8221; [...] [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 (H.R. 2679) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, &#38;#8220;The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.&#38;#8221; [...]

]]> By: More Sense Than Money &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/comment-page-1/#comment-37327 More Sense Than Money &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:37:00 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/07/attacking-jesus-mt-soledad-cross-unconstituional/#comment-37327 [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 (H.R . 2679) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, &#8220;The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.&#8221; [...] [...] The Public Expression of Religion Act of 2005 (H.R . 2679) would prevent secular organizations from collecting attorney fees after suing communities to remove memorial crosses, Ten Commandments displays, or any other vestige of the Christian faith. The legislation reads, &#38;#8220;The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to injunctive relief.&#38;#8221; [...]

]]>