http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:23 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37169 Real Teen- Right on the Right » Blog Archive » CrossPost: ACLU and Assisted Suicide Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:40:53 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37169 [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The “death with dignity” crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. “The ACLU recognizes the right of a patient to euthanasia…”–ACLU Policy Guide of 1986. They have also went to the defense of many in assisted suicide cases, and other “right to die” cases See here. In 1988 the ACLU supported a proposal in Michigan that would allow a panel of physicians to determine whether a person is terminally ill and mentally competent to choose to have a physician-assisted death. [...] [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The “death with dignity” crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. “The ACLU recognizes the right of a patient to euthanasia…”–ACLU Policy Guide of 1986. They have also went to the defense of many in assisted suicide cases, and other “right to die” cases See here. In 1988 the ACLU supported a proposal in Michigan that would allow a panel of physicians to determine whether a person is terminally ill and mentally competent to choose to have a physician-assisted death. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37168 Freedom of Thought » Stop The ACLU Blogburst Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:54:05 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37168 [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The “death with dignity” crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. [...] [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The “death with dignity” crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37167 Oh How I Love Jesus » Blog Archive » Our Differences With The ACLU On Assisted Suicide Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:02:02 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37167 [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The “death with dignity” crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. “The ACLU recognizes the right of a patient to euthanasia…”–ACLU Policy Guide of 1986. They have also went to the defense of many in assisted suicide cases, and other “right to die” cases See here. In 1988 the ACLU supported a proposal in Michigan that would allow a panel of physicians to determine whether a person is terminally ill and mentally competent to choose to have a physician-assisted death. [...] [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The “death with dignity” crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. “The ACLU recognizes the right of a patient to euthanasia…”–ACLU Policy Guide of 1986. They have also went to the defense of many in assisted suicide cases, and other “right to die” cases See here. In 1988 the ACLU supported a proposal in Michigan that would allow a panel of physicians to determine whether a person is terminally ill and mentally competent to choose to have a physician-assisted death. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37166 Cafe Oregano Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:11:41 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37166 <strong>The Right to Live</strong> I am interested in your comments on this issue, regardless of which side of the debate you believe. However, I ask that you read this entire article and take the time to consider what is said before you leave your... The Right to Live
I am interested in your comments on this issue, regardless of which side of the debate you believe. However, I ask that you read this entire article and take the time to consider what is said before you leave your…

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37165 euphoricreality.net &#38;#187; Stop the ACLU Blogburst Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:11:40 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37165 [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The &#8220;death with dignity&#8221; crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree with that, but I think this opens Pandora&#8217;s box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death-type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their Hippocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. &#8220;The ACLU recognizes the right of a patient to euthanasia&#8230;&#8221;&#8211;ACLU Policy Guide of 1986. They have also went to the defense of many in assisted suicide cases, and other &#8220;right to die&#8221; cases See here. In 1988 the ACLU supported a proposal in Michigan that would allow a panel of physicians to determine whether a person is terminally ill and mentally competent to choose to have a physician-assisted death. [...] [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The &#38;#8220;death with dignity&#38;#8221; crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree with that, but I think this opens Pandora&#38;#8217;s box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death-type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their Hippocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. &#38;#8220;The ACLU recognizes the right of a patient to euthanasia&#38;#8230;&#38;#8221;&#38;#8211;ACLU Policy Guide of 1986. They have also went to the defense of many in assisted suicide cases, and other &#38;#8220;right to die&#38;#8221; cases See here. In 1988 the ACLU supported a proposal in Michigan that would allow a panel of physicians to determine whether a person is terminally ill and mentally competent to choose to have a physician-assisted death. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37164 Stop The ACLU &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; The ACLU&#38;#8217;s Euthanasia Thu, 06 Oct 2005 04:04:19 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37164 [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The &#8220;death with dignity&#8221; crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. [...] [...] Yesterday, the new session of the Supreme Court opened with the controversial topic of assisted suicide. The legal debate is over States rights, but for America the real debate is a moral one. The &#38;#8220;death with dignity&#38;#8221; crowd plea that someone who is terminal and suffering should be allowed to die in a less painful way. There may be many of you that agree, but I think this opens the pandoras box. Once we hand over power to the medical community to determine who is fit to live, we open the door for some Dr. Death type zealot to step in. Many doctors feel if they were compelled by the State to comply with the wishes of a patient to help them die, it would be a violation of their hypocratic oath. North American Patriot points out from an article in the Scientific American Of the 34 euthanasia cases, Ogden found that half were botched and ultimately resulted in increased suffering. This is where the moral line gets drawn. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37163 ArrMatey Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:42:33 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37163 SCOTUS should keep the federal government out of this one. This is a fight we need to have in the states. SCOTUS should keep the federal government out of this one. This is a fight we need to have in the states.

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37162 Donkey Stomp Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:30:50 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37162 <strong>Assisted Suicide is Murder</strong> It is not a state's right to allow murder. The federal constitution gives the American people a right to life and the federal governent should protect that right. Assisted Suicide is Murder
It is not a state’s right to allow murder. The federal constitution gives the American people a right to life and the federal governent should protect that right.

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37161 Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator Wed, 05 Oct 2005 18:55:53 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37161 <strong>Top court revisits to physician-assisted suicide</strong> The Supreme Court is revisiting the emotionally charged issue of physician-assisted suicide in a tes Top court revisits to physician-assisted suicide
The Supreme Court is revisiting the emotionally charged issue of physician-assisted suicide in a tes

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/comment-page-1/#comment-37160 Gribbit Wed, 05 Oct 2005 18:35:45 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/10/05/supreme-court-opens-with-assisted-suicide-case/#comment-37160 Sorry Jay, I couldn't find the story. Then I got called away. Sorry Jay, I couldn’t find the story. Then I got called away.

]]>