Comments on: ACLU Wages War On Recruiters – Again

By: Grendel's Dragon

Grendel's Dragon — Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:34:42 +0000

NYCLU cracking down on recruiting?
On the other hand, the poor kiddies need protection from those fast talkin’ fascists in spiffy uniforms. Even if they are old enough to say they don’t want to be baby-killers. Which are they? Sophisticates or simps?

By: Dethanial

Dethanial — Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:44:19 +0000

I whole heartedly agree with Jay. The ACLU want the draft to come back. It would be a good thing, then every able bodied male could serve 2 years or go to Canada.

By: NIF

NIF — Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:38:02 +0000

Countdown to the weekend
Today’s dose of NIF – News, Interesting &#38; Funny … Weekend!

By: Justthisguy

Justthisguy — Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:34:21 +0000

The Founders got it right, the first time, i.e:

1. Show up for militia drill or you don’t get to vote.

2. Volunteers only, for foreign wars.

By: Mike's America

Mike's America — Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:12:20 +0000

Good Post… But if that’s the best the looney tune lefties can do, I wouldn’t sweat it.

I’ve been deluged with a “Gaffa” virus all week. And endless stream of Michael Moore agitprop, all couched in rational-sounding speech.

That’s the worst kind of moonbat, fortunately in short supply.

By: John of Argghhh!

John of Argghhh! — Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:34:22 +0000

Pete – the police are sometimes used for unjust goals.

There are people (here, I think) that think the ACLU works for some unjust goals.

If that is the only criteria you are going to apply, there’s not going to be much recruiting anywhere, is there?

By: Argghhh! The Home Of Two Of Jonah's Military Guys..

Argghhh! The Home Of Two Of Jonah's Military Guys.. — Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:32:33 +0000

Two thoughts for today.
Euripides sez: When talking to someone who is a DU’er remember… Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. Thoughts for those engulfed with long-simmering (as in generations-old) hatred: Waste not fresh tears over old griefs. H/t, Jim…

By: BloodSpite

BloodSpite — Sun, 25 Sep 2005 14:48:55 +0000

“And as a side recrimination, what will happen to the under privileged who cannot afford to go on to college? Those enlistment bonuses and the GI Bill which pays for so many to attend college would not be there for most. Because why should the government pay for these benefits when they can get their recruits by drawing a number.”

But see there lies the Crux! they don’t want the average people educated, they don’t want the average person to be able to afford a better education or a better way of life. If Communism is their goal, isn’t it based on a pyramidical ideal that the 60% of the populace are merely a working class, with a bare handfull as the ruling authority?

For them to stop recruiters is a win-win situation for them!

And a lose lose for the rest of us.

By: bRight &#38; Early &#187; Posts you may have missed . . .

bRight &#38; Early &#187; Posts you may have missed . . . — Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:25:46 +0000

[...] I liked this story at Stop the ACLU, if only for this quote: Isn’t it odd that the ACLU sees a 13 year old responsible enough to make choices as to whether or not to have sex, with whom to have sex, under what conditions to have sex, deal with the consequences of having sex, use drugs, drink alcohol, and commit other criminal acts, but they see a 17 or 18 year old high school student as being incapable of deciding upon entering military service? [...]

By: kender

kender — Sun, 25 Sep 2005 07:35:03 +0000

“Political correctness” and “intellect”.

Seems one cancels out the other. Pete is a coward AND an idiot.