http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/16/back-to-the-future-on-the-pledge/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:16:30 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/16/back-to-the-future-on-the-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-36154 gus3 Sat, 17 Sep 2005 05:16:55 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/16/back-to-the-future-on-the-pledge/#comment-36154 Establishment clause, blah blah blah. Isn't it interesting how the court ignores Free Speech in the process? What if a student *wants* to say the Pledge, complete with "Under God"? Establishment clause, blah blah blah. Isn’t it interesting how the court ignores Free Speech in the process? What if a student *wants* to say the Pledge, complete with “Under God”?

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/16/back-to-the-future-on-the-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-36153 Jay Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:56:12 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/16/back-to-the-future-on-the-pledge/#comment-36153 Sounds like lawyer talk to me. They don't leave any precedence. I don't think it matters so much anymore other than precendent. Parents teach your children the pledge with God, tell them to say it anyway. If the schools try to stop them from adding it in, then this will clearly be a case where religious speech is being repressed. Sounds like lawyer talk to me. They don’t leave any precedence. I don’t think it matters so much anymore other than precendent. Parents teach your children the pledge with God, tell them to say it anyway. If the schools try to stop them from adding it in, then this will clearly be a case where religious speech is being repressed.

]]>