http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:03:40 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35763 Revealing The ACLU - Standing Up Against the Greatest Overt Attack in American History » ACLU Cheers Election Results Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:37:32 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35763 [...] Ah, the old “Safe and Free” banner! Since when did the ACLU care about us being “safe”? So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety; in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. [...] [...] Ah, the old “Safe and Free” banner! Since when did the ACLU care about us being “safe”? So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety; in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35762 Stop The ACLU Blogburst at Irate Nation Thu, 09 Nov 2006 06:38:01 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35762 [...] Ah, the old “Safe and Free” banner! Since when did the ACLU care about us being “safe”? So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety; in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. They have since then demanded that the government release and make public top secret security information regarding not only the activities of our military, but also that of our intelligence forces. They have also initiated one lawsuit after another against the government to stop the searching of individuals for security purposes in mass transit situations, and to stop the government from detaining and questioning or interrogating individuals who have ties or contact with known terrorist individuals and organizations. That is just naming their actions off the top of my head. The fact is that the ACLU is making America less safe. If what the ACLU means by political scare tactics are the warnings about the NSA surveillance program being put into jeopardy and other liberal techniques of surrender and stupidity then I must disagree. Perhaps the American people fell for the scare tactics of groups like the ACLU. It isn’t a scare tactic to state the truth about the threats we face from our enemies, and the threats still remain. The beat goes on. In several congressional races voters rejected the strategy to paint national security as a polarizing issue. In Ohio, incumbent Senator Mike DeWine was defeated. DeWine sponsored legislation that condoned the president’s warrantless wiretapping program. [...] [...] Ah, the old “Safe and Free” banner! Since when did the ACLU care about us being “safe”? So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety; in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. They have since then demanded that the government release and make public top secret security information regarding not only the activities of our military, but also that of our intelligence forces. They have also initiated one lawsuit after another against the government to stop the searching of individuals for security purposes in mass transit situations, and to stop the government from detaining and questioning or interrogating individuals who have ties or contact with known terrorist individuals and organizations. That is just naming their actions off the top of my head. The fact is that the ACLU is making America less safe. If what the ACLU means by political scare tactics are the warnings about the NSA surveillance program being put into jeopardy and other liberal techniques of surrender and stupidity then I must disagree. Perhaps the American people fell for the scare tactics of groups like the ACLU. It isn’t a scare tactic to state the truth about the threats we face from our enemies, and the threats still remain. The beat goes on. In several congressional races voters rejected the strategy to paint national security as a polarizing issue. In Ohio, incumbent Senator Mike DeWine was defeated. DeWine sponsored legislation that condoned the president’s warrantless wiretapping program. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35760 Right on the Right » ACLU Blaming Bush… Again Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:00:13 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35760 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35761 The Irate Nation - » Stop The ACLU Blogburst Thu, 07 Sep 2006 06:15:28 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35761 [...] "So called" unlawful combatants? If you are not abiding by the rules of being a lawful combatant then you aren’t one. It is that simple. The ACLU are the ones looking for loop holes in the system, and the very reason they are so up and arms on this is that it closes them up. What the President is asking is for Congress to make the definitions clear. In the Hamdan case, which the ACLU played a major part in, the door was left wide open for Congress to clarify and create legislation making military tribunals the main process for due process dealing with terrorists caught on the battle field. What does the ACLU have against bringing these murderers to justice? The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. “The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that “promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state.” The Rockefeller Foundation’s provisions state that recipients of its funds may not “directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity.” [...] [...] "So called" unlawful combatants? If you are not abiding by the rules of being a lawful combatant then you aren’t one. It is that simple. The ACLU are the ones looking for loop holes in the system, and the very reason they are so up and arms on this is that it closes them up. What the President is asking is for Congress to make the definitions clear. In the Hamdan case, which the ACLU played a major part in, the door was left wide open for Congress to clarify and create legislation making military tribunals the main process for due process dealing with terrorists caught on the battle field. What does the ACLU have against bringing these murderers to justice? The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. “The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that “promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state.” The Rockefeller Foundation’s provisions state that recipients of its funds may not “directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity.” [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35759 Conservative Culture » ACLU Banner Deceptive - Of Course it is! Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:42:06 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35759 [...] A while back, my friend Kathy wrote about how deceptive this banner is, and it still applies today. So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety, in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. [...] [...] A while back, my friend Kathy wrote about how deceptive this banner is, and it still applies today. So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety, in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35758 Conservative Thinking Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:30:53 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35758 <strong>ACLU: Working For A Less Secure America</strong> The above banner and slogan is quite deceptive and an utter joke to those that are truly aware to the ACLU's workings. Just in the past week the ACLU has launched a massive campaign against the NSA's efforts to... ACLU: Working For A Less Secure America
The above banner and slogan is quite deceptive and an utter joke to those that are truly aware to the ACLU’s workings. Just in the past week the ACLU has launched a massive campaign against the NSA’s efforts to…

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35757 Aparaty cyfrowe Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:58:27 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35757 I also oneself something would want to find out on this theme. Very attentively I will read every post. I also oneself something would want to find out on this theme. Very attentively I will read every post.

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35756 Stop The ACLU &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; This ACLU Banner Is Deceptive Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:27:52 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35756 [...] Crossposted from Is it Just Me? So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety, in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. [...] [...] Crossposted from Is it Just Me? So now the ACLU is promoting itself as a champion of both safety for our citizens and of freedom. What a joke! When 9-11 occurred what measures did the ACLU take to ensure our safety? None, zip, nada. This organization has done nothing to ensure our safety, in fact it has chosen to sue our government on behalf of terrorists outside of their legal jurisdiction while they were located in prisons on foreign soil. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35755 Stop The ACLU &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Who Is Stop The ACLU? Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:26:54 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35755 [...] Such as: The Legalization of Child Porn Distribution Defending The Enemy Tax Exemptions For Wiccans, but not for Christian Churches Open Borders Opposition To The Second Amendment [...] [...] Such as: The Legalization of Child Porn Distribution Defending The Enemy Tax Exemptions For Wiccans, but not for Christian Churches Open Borders Opposition To The Second Amendment [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-35754 Stop The ACLU &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU Freedom of Information Request Would Gut NSA Program Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:29:41 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/09/08/aclu-to-gitmo-terrorists-dont-talk/#comment-35754 [...] I couldn&#8217;t say it any better myself. There is no reason to release the details of the NSA program. Doing so would benefit no one but our enemies, and only endanger America further. This irresponsible position of the ACLU is reckless and crazy. But we have come to expect such traitorous behavior from the so called civil rights group. They oppose almost every effort our government has to fight terrorism with one hand, and defend our enemies with the other. I still can not understand why our government has not investigated the ACLU itself, they most definitely have probably cause to do so. [...] [...] I couldn&#38;#8217;t say it any better myself. There is no reason to release the details of the NSA program. Doing so would benefit no one but our enemies, and only endanger America further. This irresponsible position of the ACLU is reckless and crazy. But we have come to expect such traitorous behavior from the so called civil rights group. They oppose almost every effort our government has to fight terrorism with one hand, and defend our enemies with the other. I still can not understand why our government has not investigated the ACLU itself, they most definitely have probably cause to do so. [...]

]]>