http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:50:16 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34572 Who Funds The ACLU? « Morning Coffee Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:03:08 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34572 [...] I’m not sure about the other state branches but The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio said it will no longer accept funding from the United Way so as not to complete a required counterterrorism compliance form. [...] [...] I’m not sure about the other state branches but The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio said it will no longer accept funding from the United Way so as not to complete a required counterterrorism compliance form. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34573 California Conservative » ACLU Will Swear No Oath Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:01:27 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34573 [...] In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because they objected to promising that none of the funds would be used to engage in any activity that promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state. They got the provision scrapped after a long and vigorous fight, then accepted the funds. The American Civil Liberties Union and 12 other national non-profit organizations today said they have successfully challenged Office of Personnel Management’s Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) requirements that all participating charities check their employees and expenditures against several government watch lists for “terrorist activities” and that organizations certify that they do not contribute funds to organizations on those lists. [...] [...] In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because they objected to promising that none of the funds would be used to engage in any activity that promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state. They got the provision scrapped after a long and vigorous fight, then accepted the funds. The American Civil Liberties Union and 12 other national non-profit organizations today said they have successfully challenged Office of Personnel Management’s Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) requirements that all participating charities check their employees and expenditures against several government watch lists for “terrorist activities” and that organizations certify that they do not contribute funds to organizations on those lists. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34574 Conservative Thinking Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:04:53 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34574 <strong>No Oaths From ACLU</strong> Via ACLU Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist groups. The American Civil Liberties... No Oaths From ACLU
Via ACLU Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist groups. The American Civil Liberties…

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34566 FullosseousFlap&#38;#8217;s Dental Blog &#38;#187; Stop the ACLU Blogburst Watch: ACLU Accuses Bush Of Gutting Geneva Conventions Enforcement and Undermining Due Process For Terror Detainees Fri, 08 Sep 2006 03:33:51 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34566 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34567 Conservative Culture &#38;#187; Stop the ACLU Blogburst - Geneva Convention Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:12:51 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34567 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it&#8217;s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#38;#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it&#38;#8217;s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34568 The Real Ugly American.com &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU Accuses Bush of Gutting Geneva Conventions Enforcement and Undermining Due Process For Terror Detainees Thu, 07 Sep 2006 04:00:35 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34568 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#38;#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34569 Cigar Intelligence Agency &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU: &#38;#8220;it&#38;#8217;s horrific abuse&#38;#8221; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 03:56:30 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34569 [...] &#8220;So called&#8221; unlawful combatants? If you are not abiding by the rules of being a lawful combatant then you aren&#8217;t one. It is that simple. The ACLU are the ones looking for loop holes in the system, and the very reason they are so up and arms on this is that it closes them up. What the President is asking is for Congress to make the definitions clear. In the Hamdan case, which the ACLU played a major part in, the door was left wide open for Congress to clarify and create legislation making military tribunals the main process for due process dealing with terrorists caught on the battle field. What does the ACLU have against bringing these murderers to justice? The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. “The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that “promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state.” The Rockefeller Foundation’s provisions state that recipients of its funds may not “directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity.” [...] [...] &#38;#8220;So called&#38;#8221; unlawful combatants? If you are not abiding by the rules of being a lawful combatant then you aren&#38;#8217;t one. It is that simple. The ACLU are the ones looking for loop holes in the system, and the very reason they are so up and arms on this is that it closes them up. What the President is asking is for Congress to make the definitions clear. In the Hamdan case, which the ACLU played a major part in, the door was left wide open for Congress to clarify and create legislation making military tribunals the main process for due process dealing with terrorists caught on the battle field. What does the ACLU have against bringing these murderers to justice? The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#38;#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. “The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that “promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state.” The Rockefeller Foundation’s provisions state that recipients of its funds may not “directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity.” [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34570 Conservative Thinking Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:51:11 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34570 <strong>Al Qaeda Can Count On The ACLU</strong> Crossposted from Stop The ACLU It isn't suprising that the ACLU were quick to react to Bush's jaw dropping speech admitting to secret CIA prisons and pushing Congress to pass legislation that would put captured terror supspects under the rule... Al Qaeda Can Count On The ACLU
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU It isn’t suprising that the ACLU were quick to react to Bush’s jaw dropping speech admitting to secret CIA prisons and pushing Congress to pass legislation that would put captured terror supspects under the rule…

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34571 Parrot Check &#38;#187; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:42:19 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34571 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it&#8217;s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#38;#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it&#38;#8217;s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/comment-page-2/#comment-34565 The Right Track &#38;#187; Stop the ACLU Blogburst Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:12:42 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/09/aclu-of-ohio-refuses-funds-from-united-way/#comment-34565 [...] The ACLU consistently allign themselves with groups like CAIR, and other organizations that have known terrorist ties. They have turned down donations from some of their most generous donors because of anti-terrorism stipulations. They can always be seen defending our enemies. It is no wonder that they fight to exempt lawyers from anti-terror supporting oaths. [...] [...] The ACLU consistently allign themselves with groups like CAIR, and other organizations that have known terrorist ties. They have turned down donations from some of their most generous donors because of anti-terrorism stipulations. They can always be seen defending our enemies. It is no wonder that they fight to exempt lawyers from anti-terror supporting oaths. [...]

]]>