<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU And The Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:01:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PeterJ</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34205</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34205</guid>
		<description>The second amendment was put in place to &quot;regulate&quot; the militia.  That is what is neccessary to secure a &quot;free&quot; state.  That is what the amendment states.  Why educated people cannot read this amendment with understanding is confusing to me.  It has nothing to do with sport.  It has nothing to do with feeding the family.  It has nothing to do with securing &quot;the&quot; state.  It has nothing to do with arming the state.  People need to read the Constitution.  In it they will find provisions for establishing and arming the militia.  Read the Declaration of Independance and tell me how we Americans could write that document without being able to stand up to an army?  There aren&#039;t any free rock and bottle chuckers...  and you can quote me on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second amendment was put in place to &#8220;regulate&#8221; the militia.  That is what is neccessary to secure a &#8220;free&#8221; state.  That is what the amendment states.  Why educated people cannot read this amendment with understanding is confusing to me.  It has nothing to do with sport.  It has nothing to do with feeding the family.  It has nothing to do with securing &#8220;the&#8221; state.  It has nothing to do with arming the state.  People need to read the Constitution.  In it they will find provisions for establishing and arming the militia.  Read the Declaration of Independance and tell me how we Americans could write that document without being able to stand up to an army?  There aren&#8217;t any free rock and bottle chuckers&#8230;  and you can quote me on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34204</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34204</guid>
		<description>In an apparent effort to preserve individuals&#039; rights to keep and bear arms under the 2nd Amendment, a new site opened last week (11-11-07) dedicated to helping people buy or sell  firearms from/to people IN THEIR OWN STATE.  As it turns out, it&#039;s legal in many states to buy/sell/trade firearms between INDIVIDUALS without having to register the transaction nor to report it to any government agency. There is no charge to post to, or browse, the site.

It can be found at http://www.internet-grocer.net/cgi/classif/classifieds.cgi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an apparent effort to preserve individuals&#8217; rights to keep and bear arms under the 2nd Amendment, a new site opened last week (11-11-07) dedicated to helping people buy or sell  firearms from/to people IN THEIR OWN STATE.  As it turns out, it&#8217;s legal in many states to buy/sell/trade firearms between INDIVIDUALS without having to register the transaction nor to report it to any government agency. There is no charge to post to, or browse, the site.</p>
<p>It can be found at <a href="http://www.internet-grocer.net/cgi/classif/classifieds.cgi" rel="nofollow">http://www.internet-grocer.net/cgi/classif/classifieds.cgi</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loboinok</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34203</link>
		<dc:creator>loboinok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34203</guid>
		<description>WOW Roy! It&#039;s hard to counter such wisdom and wit, so why don&#039;t you dazzle us with your brilliance and teach us &quot;morons&quot; about the ACLU?

Then when you&#039;re done...come up front where current events are being discussed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW Roy! It&#8217;s hard to counter such wisdom and wit, so why don&#8217;t you dazzle us with your brilliance and teach us &#8220;morons&#8221; about the ACLU?</p>
<p>Then when you&#8217;re done&#8230;come up front where current events are being discussed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34202</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34202</guid>
		<description>Wow. I&#039;ve never seen such rantings...much of it from morons who don&#039;t
know the ACLU from Adam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;ve never seen such rantings&#8230;much of it from morons who don&#8217;t<br />
know the ACLU from Adam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JackLewis.net</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34201</link>
		<dc:creator>JackLewis.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34201</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Stop the ACLU&quot; BlogBurst: A Short History Of The ACLU&lt;/strong&gt;
	Cross posted from Stop the ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it’s pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU’s founding....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Stop the ACLU&#8221; BlogBurst: A Short History Of The ACLU</strong><br />
	Cross posted from Stop the ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it’s pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU’s founding&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34200</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34200</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Roots&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it&#039;s pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU&#039;s founding. Does...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Roots</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it&#8217;s pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU&#8217;s founding. Does&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revealing The ACLU - Standing Up Against the Greatest Overt Attack in American History &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34196</link>
		<dc:creator>Revealing The ACLU - Standing Up Against the Greatest Overt Attack in American History &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34196</guid>
		<description>[...] ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy   By david Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#38;#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is fed up with is hypocrisy and the ACLU is full of it. Purging the ACLU of its hypocrisy is bound to be a goliath task. Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. The ACLU have fought tooth and nail against the Bush administration&#38;#8217;s NSA program, a program designed to track international phone calls being made to or from suspected terrorist organizations. They have hailed themselves defenders of the right to privacy and labelled the program an illegal &#38;#8220;secret&#38;#8221; program of &#38;#8220;domestic spying&#38;#8221;. All the while the ACLU has its own &#38;#8220;secret&#38;#8221; program of domestic spying of its own members and their personal financial information. This program has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with the real bottom line of fundraising. Former ACLU board member Michael Myers was shocked at this discovery. The American Civil Liberties Union is using sophisticated technology to collect a wide variety of information about its members and donors in a fund-raising effort that has ignited a bitter debate over its leaders? commitment to privacy rights. Some board members say the extensive data collection makes a mockery of the organization?s frequent criticism of banks, corporations and government agencies for their practice of accumulating data on people for marketing and other purposes. The group?s new data collection practices were implemented without the board?s approval or knowledge and were in violation of the ACLU?s privacy policy at the time, according to Michael Meyers, vice president of the organization and a frequent internal critic. He said he had learned about the new research by accident Nov. 7 during a meeting of the committee that is organizing the group?s Biennial Conference in July. He objected to the practices, and the next day, the privacy policy on the group?s Web site was changed. ?They took out all the language that would show that they were violating their own policy,? Meyers said. ?In doing so, they sanctified their procedure while still keeping it secret.? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy   By david Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#38;#38;#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is fed up with is hypocrisy and the ACLU is full of it. Purging the ACLU of its hypocrisy is bound to be a goliath task. Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? In August of 2005 the New York ACLU sued against random bag searches on the NY Subway. Ironically the NYCLU HQ has a sign warning visitors that all bags are subject to search. The ACLU have fought tooth and nail against the Bush administration&#38;#38;#8217;s NSA program, a program designed to track international phone calls being made to or from suspected terrorist organizations. They have hailed themselves defenders of the right to privacy and labelled the program an illegal &#38;#38;#8220;secret&#38;#38;#8221; program of &#38;#38;#8220;domestic spying&#38;#38;#8221;. All the while the ACLU has its own &#38;#38;#8220;secret&#38;#38;#8221; program of domestic spying of its own members and their personal financial information. This program has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with the real bottom line of fundraising. Former ACLU board member Michael Myers was shocked at this discovery. The American Civil Liberties Union is using sophisticated technology to collect a wide variety of information about its members and donors in a fund-raising effort that has ignited a bitter debate over its leaders? commitment to privacy rights. Some board members say the extensive data collection makes a mockery of the organization?s frequent criticism of banks, corporations and government agencies for their practice of accumulating data on people for marketing and other purposes. The group?s new data collection practices were implemented without the board?s approval or knowledge and were in violation of the ACLU?s privacy policy at the time, according to Michael Meyers, vice president of the organization and a frequent internal critic. He said he had learned about the new research by accident Nov. 7 during a meeting of the committee that is organizing the group?s Biennial Conference in July. He objected to the practices, and the next day, the privacy policy on the group?s Web site was changed. ?They took out all the language that would show that they were violating their own policy,? Meyers said. ?In doing so, they sanctified their procedure while still keeping it secret.? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Culture &#38;#38;#187; Blogburst - ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s Hypocricy Legacy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-34199</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Culture &#38;#38;#187; Blogburst - ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s Hypocricy Legacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34199</guid>
		<description>[...] Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-34198</link>
		<dc:creator>Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34198</guid>
		<description>[...] Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#8220;the people&#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where do we even begin with the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s hypocrisy? How about its odd stance on the Second Amendment? They have decided that the term &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; that is contained in the Second Amendment does not apply to &#38;#38;#8220;the people&#38;#38;#8221; as it does in all of the other rights contained in the Bill of Rights. They defend even the most radical in free speech for individuals, but somehow have adopted the opposite position on the Second Amendment. Surely it couldn&#38;#38;#8217;t be that the Second Amendment doesn&#38;#38;#8217;t fall within the boundaries of their liberal agenda! Could it? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-34197</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/08/04/aclu-and-the-second-amendment/#comment-34197</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Hypocrisy Files&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#039;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Hypocrisy Files</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
