Richard said:
“Freedom to choose, freedom to speak, freedom to act is what the ACLU represents, yet you continue to villify and scorn, name-call and attempt to ridicule. What is it you want? A “Christian” country?”

I don’t think we need a Christian country, however, it seems that the ACLU is all for freedom of speech as long as it has no moral or Christian value and as long as it doesn’t impose on the ears of those who “feel” they shouldn’t be forced to hear it.

Freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion. I don’t hear a peep from the ACLU about Qurans and other religious materials being bought with taxpayer money for prisoners at GITMO.

It must be the engineering brain, because the thought crossed my mind too. I still think she did the right thing in this case, but I’m with you on impoverishing my enemies.
However, I HAVE been called “Machiavellian” by moonbat trolls.

Which reminds me, I ordered a “free Quran” from CAIR, too. Not because I want it, but to lighten their wallets.

Like, remember the anti-apartheid movement? Sure, I could see the benefit of boycotting S. African products, sports teams, travel, etc. But I never understood the benefit of divesting the stock of companies that do business in S. Africa. If we own the stock, then we can vote in shareholder resolutions not to do any further investing in S. Africa, to adopt the Solomon Amendments (barring racial discrimination by the corporation, even if legal), and engage in accounting maneuvers to defer paying taxes, thereby starving the central government, etc. But if all the people of good will sell their stock, they will be selling – by necessity – to people who don’t care. How was that supposed to help the situation? “Symbolically.” Seemed like a big price to pay for symbolism.

My mind just doesn’t work that way, I guess. Sorry if I offend you; again, none was intended.