http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:29:39 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33658 New Trommetter Times » Blog Archive » Defending America’s Enemies Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:36:47 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33658 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33659 Cigar Intelligence Agency » Blog Archive » ACLU: it’s horrific abuse Thu, 07 Sep 2006 03:55:34 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33659 [...] “So called” unlawful combatants? If you are not abiding by the rules of being a lawful combatant then you aren’t one. It is that simple. The ACLU are the ones looking for loop holes in the system, and the very reason they are so up and arms on this is that it closes them up. What the President is asking is for Congress to make the definitions clear. In the Hamdan case, which the ACLU played a major part in, the door was left wide open for Congress to clarify and create legislation making military tribunals the main process for due process dealing with terrorists caught on the battle field. What does the ACLU have against bringing these murderers to justice? The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. “The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that “promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state.” The Rockefeller Foundation’s provisions state that recipients of its funds may not “directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity.” [...] [...] “So called” unlawful combatants? If you are not abiding by the rules of being a lawful combatant then you aren’t one. It is that simple. The ACLU are the ones looking for loop holes in the system, and the very reason they are so up and arms on this is that it closes them up. What the President is asking is for Congress to make the definitions clear. In the Hamdan case, which the ACLU played a major part in, the door was left wide open for Congress to clarify and create legislation making military tribunals the main process for due process dealing with terrorists caught on the battle field. What does the ACLU have against bringing these murderers to justice? The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980’s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. “The Ford Foundation now bars recipients of its funds from engaging in any activity that “promotes violence, terrorism, bigotry, or the destruction of any state.” The Rockefeller Foundation’s provisions state that recipients of its funds may not “directly or indirectly engage in, promote, or support other organizations or individuals who engage in or promote terrorist activity.” [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33660 Conservative Thinking Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:51:26 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33660 <strong>Al Qaeda Can Count On The ACLU</strong> Crossposted from Stop The ACLU It isn't suprising that the ACLU were quick to react to Bush's jaw dropping speech admitting to secret CIA prisons and pushing Congress to pass legislation that would put captured terror supspects under the rule... Al Qaeda Can Count On The ACLU
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU It isn’t suprising that the ACLU were quick to react to Bush’s jaw dropping speech admitting to secret CIA prisons and pushing Congress to pass legislation that would put captured terror supspects under the rule…

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33661 Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism! Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:39:58 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33661 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#38;#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it’s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33657 Ledger Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:28:19 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33657 Interesting post. I never Qaddafi use the ACLU to get him out of a bind. Did any tax payer money get spent on that project? Interesting post. I never Qaddafi use the ACLU to get him out of a bind. Did any tax payer money get spent on that project?

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33656 Stop The ACLU &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; ACLU&#38;#8217;s War Against National Security Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:41:09 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33656 [...] The ACLU Defends &#8220;Mad Dog&#8221; of Libya, Muammar Qaddafi. “In 1985, the ACLU learned of an alleged plan by the CIA to engineer Qaddafi’s overthrow. Outraged, they put together a “strenuous” public protest against this proposed action. [...] [...] The ACLU Defends &#38;#8220;Mad Dog&#38;#8221; of Libya, Muammar Qaddafi. “In 1985, the ACLU learned of an alleged plan by the CIA to engineer Qaddafi’s overthrow. Outraged, they put together a “strenuous” public protest against this proposed action. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33655 Conservative Thinking Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:13:25 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33655 <strong>The ACLU's War on National Security</strong> Crossposted from Stop The ACLU In conjunction with the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the ACLU has lobbied hard against Arab-profiling at airports for years. “Profiles are notoriously under-inclusive,” says ACLU legi... The ACLU’s War on National Security
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU In conjunction with the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the ACLU has lobbied hard against Arab-profiling at airports for years. “Profiles are notoriously under-inclusive,” says ACLU legi…

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33654 News Storage :: Top Ten Reasons to Stop The ACLU :: November :: 2005 Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:58:28 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33654 [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. [...] [...] The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#38;#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. [...]

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33653 NIF Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:38:10 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33653 <strong>Roll the dice</strong> Today's dose of NIF - News, Interesting &#38; Funny ... It's Stop the ACLU Thursday (+ Open Trackbacks) Roll the dice
Today’s dose of NIF – News, Interesting &#38;#38; Funny … It’s Stop the ACLU Thursday (+ Open Trackbacks)

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-33652 Freedom of Thought &#38;#187; Stop the ACLU Blogburst Thu, 10 Nov 2005 06:19:19 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/20/enemy-within-part-ii/#comment-33652 [...] #3. The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it&#8217;s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...] [...] #3. The ACLU Defend the enemy. They have a long history of this one. They defended the P.L.O. in 1985. They defended Quadafi in the 1980&#38;#8217;s. And they continue today. They have told Gitmo detainees they have the right to remain silent, as in not talking to interrogators. One issue that really disturbs me is their refusal of funds from organizations such as the United Way that were concerned the money would be used to support terrorism. In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from two of it&#38;#8217;s most generous and loyal contributors, the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, saying new anti-terrorism restrictions demanded by the institutions make it unable to accept their funds. [...]

]]>