Enemy Within Part I

Posted on July 18, 2005

Terrorists Have Rights, Too ?

Recently the ACLU has been in a panic, shredding documents with one hand, and grabbing for Freedom Of Information with the other. What are they wanting? They want their hands on the 1,173 pages the FBI are investigating related to the ACLU.

“I know for an absolute fact that we have not been involved in anything related to promoting terrorism and yet the government has collected almost 1,200 pages on our activities,’ Romero said. ‘Why is the ACLU now the subject of scrutiny from the FBI?”‘ Source

Not promoting terrorism? The ACLU has opposed almost everything the government has done to fight terrorism! From the no-fly list to stronger border control, the ACLU has been there to oppose it. But this isn’t anything new. During their history, the ACLU has found many strange ways to distort the intentions of our founding Fathers in order to grant immunity and protection for sworn enemies of America to carry out their assault on America. Let’s take a look into history and see the MANY reasons the ACLU should be under investigation.

Sometimes their support of terrorists and their activities are subtle, like their strong objection to the use of metal detectors in America’s airports. Other times, it is much more direct.

“Like their representation of Phillip Agee. Agee is a former CIA employee who has revealed CIA secrets and names of CIA agents. When the state Department attempted to revoke Agee’s passport, the ACLU came to his defense. Where did Agee want to go? This was in 1980, during the Iran hostage crisis. He wanted to go to Iran to help Khomeini’s terrorists decipher CIA documents!”Source

The ACLU sees nothing wrong with Americans becoming traitors and selling classified government information. In 1985 Samuel L. Morrison, an employee of the Naval Intelligence Support Command was convicted and sentenced for stealing classified spy satellite photographs from his office, cutting off the “secret” designation and selling them to a foreign publication. The ACLU claimed that Morrison had the right to steal and sell these classified documents and the under the First Amendment.

Positions like these might be easier to understand if we look at ACLU Policy #117. They title this policy “Controlling the Intelligence Agencies”. ”

Limit the CIA, under the new name of the Foreign Intelligence Agency, to collecting and evaluating foreign intelligence information. Abolish all covert operations. Limit the FBI to criminal investigations by eliminating all COINTEL-PRO-type activity and all foreign and domestic intelligence investigations of groups or individuals unrelated to a specific criminal offense.

Prohibit entirely wiretaps, tapping of telecommunications and burglaries. Restrict mail openings, mail covers, inspection of bank records, and inspection of telephone records….”

In other words they want the CIA to be completely ineffective, along with the FBI.

Support Your Local P.L.O.
“I’m afraid even the good guys on civil liberties are going to be against us on this one.” Those are the words of ACLU Executive director Ira Glasser on the ACLU’s decision to represent an agent of Yassir Araftat’s Palestine Liberation Organization.
I wonder if his definition of “good guys” meant American citizens who care about their country and are not willing to grant sworn terrorists complete freedom within our borders. If so, he is absolutely correct. We are against that one.
Arafat’s group of ruthless murderers had set up an “information office” in Washington D.C, only a few blocks from the White House.

Since the 1960’s, the P.L.O. has conducted a world-wide campaign of terror and violence, openly declaring the U.S.A. to be their enemy and therefore a target for their terrorist acts.

In addition, there is overwhelming evidence that other “information offices”, like the one in Washington have actually been “safe houses”, from which terrorist attacks were launched or where huge stockpiles of weapons were amassed and stored. Source
So the State Department shut this P.L.O office down. Their decision was met with overwhelming approval of the American people.

One family in particular welcomed it more than most. The family of Robert Stethem, the young Navy diver who, during the terrorist hijacking of TWA Flight 847 in 1985, was beaten, tortured and thrown from the airplane to bleed to death on the runway.

When President and Mrs. Reagan visited Arlington National cemetery to pay their respects to Robert, they told his family, “Be strong, be patient. Robbie’s death will not have been in vain.”

However, it was hard for the Stethems not to feel that Robbie’s death had indeed been in vain. They said, “the emissaries of the Palestine Liberation Organization terror are permitted to operate within the shadow of the White House.”
The Stethems were actively involved with then Congressman Jack Kemp and others in putting pressure on the State Department to close the P.L.O. office.

In a powerful plea to the American people the Stethems passionately stated, “It’s time to set an example for the Western leaders and show the world that the United States of America is deadly serious about the war against terrorism.

“We believe that the will of American citizens through this legislation, demands that our senators and representatives act decisively and expeditiously to close P.L.O.-financed outlets which promulgate P.L.O. terrorist policies. How many more American citizens must feel such loss, hurt and pain before all elected officials act forcefully.

Robbie suffered an extremely painful death. Alone and bleeding, he was left to die on the airport runway in a foreign country. Young marines have been burned alive far away from home and families. An elderly gentleman was shot and thrown overboard, helpless to survive. Are we to allow the P.L.O. representatives to get a foothold on our soil? Are we to allow them to continue working, living and enjoying American freedoms and our way of life and at the same time, finance terror and P.L.O. policies? We say, no!” Source

Perhaps the Stethems were some of the “good guys” that Glasser was talking about. Anyway, while the Stethems, the State Department and the American people were saying “no”, the ACLU was saying “yes

When the State department decided to shut the office down, the ACLU started screaming about civil rights and first amendment guarantees, and took it to court.

Fortunately, U.S. District Court Judge Charles R. Richey rejected the ACLU’s claims and allowed the State department order to stand. Of course, this didn’t stop the ACLU. The immediately appealed. They were determined to protect these murderer’s under the first amendment. They failed again, and the court upheld the foreign policy interests of the United States in fighting terrorism.

After the second failure, the ACLU decided not to take the case to the Supreme Court. Perhaps this time the pressure of the “good guys” was a little too much for them. The pressure of the “good guys” always need to be on the ACLU.

We are planning to gather all the “good guys” to put some pressure on the ACLU! We want to organize a nation wide march on all of the ACLU offices across America. Like a ninja in stealth, the ACLU is slowly assassinating our great nation. Help us raise the money to advertise this, and make our efforts a success. Visit our store! Buy a bumper sticker! Or donate with the donation button in my sidebar. Thank you for the support!
Thanks Jawa Report
Mudville Gazette

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

» Filed Under Illegal Activities, War On Terror


Trackback URL

Comments

20 Responses to “Enemy Within Part I”

  1. Zaphriel on July 18th, 2005 11:56 pm

    Great post

  2. Paulsepp on July 19th, 2005 2:59 am

    Karl Rove loves Terrorists!!!!!!1

  3. Jay on July 19th, 2005 6:26 am

    thank you for that insightful wisdom Paul, and thank you for staying on topic. I’m sure that you completely skipped over the entire text of the article just to leave us with such a pleasant message.

  4. Ogre on July 19th, 2005 7:30 am

    That seems about on par for the ACLU — no covert operatives in the CIA. After all, everyone else in the world is nice and no one ever lies to the US. We should just let all the other countries do whatever they want.

  5. Michael R. Churchill on July 19th, 2005 12:54 pm

    Another great post Jay, and I am glad to be off of vacation after reading such literature like this post truly is.

  6. Stacy on July 19th, 2005 1:28 pm

    Thanks for always keeping us up to date Jay. I always wonder what percentage of the American populace thinks that the ACLU is a good and honest organization.

  7. Republican Vet on July 19th, 2005 3:30 pm

    Not only is Paul illiterate…..he’s ignorant.

  8. Joseph (OK Democrat) on July 19th, 2005 4:42 pm

    Good post. It’s not surprising that the ACLU, or at least the less sensible aspects of it, have directly or indirectl supported terrorists. This is the organization that defends the freedom of everyone except Americans after all. Where does the ACLU get it’s lawyers? I’d like to know so I never hire a lawyer from that university.

  9. Goose on July 19th, 2005 4:47 pm

    This has to be the quote of the year. Or stupid question of the year: “Why is the ACLU now the subject of scrutiny from the FBI?” Well, I don’t know Mr. Remero, perhaps because you defend terrorists? You freakin idiot… What a maroon…

  10. Republican Vet on July 19th, 2005 5:58 pm

    Lol, maroon.

  11. Republican Vet on July 19th, 2005 6:11 pm

    Hey guys, I just found something out!

    Apparently, according to the ACLU and the left-wing moonbat patrol, my mother hugs a terrorist every day……

    ME! I’m the terrorist who fought in OIF and OEF for no reason.

    What a concept.

  12. david Schantz on July 19th, 2005 6:13 pm

    Does the heart godd knowing the the FBI has a file on the ACLU.
    Is there a way to order stuff from the store without using a credit card, I got rid of mine.

    God Bless America, God Save The Republic

  13. Jay on July 19th, 2005 6:28 pm

    Sure is David..through paypal. You can set up a paypal account for free and it is secure and comes out of your bank.

  14. steve on July 19th, 2005 7:26 pm

    Ugghhh…

    Jay come read a little observation about my flight home today from Vegas.

  15. Ken Taylor on July 19th, 2005 11:11 pm

    Great post. I’m surprised that the ACLU hasn’t offered to defend Saddam and I’m sure when Bin Laden is captured, (if he’s not killed first) that the ACLU will come to his defense! Defending the indefensable! The ACLU motto!

    Ken Taylor

  16. David Schantz on July 20th, 2005 1:02 am

    Jay, Thanks for the info and for getting me to stop back. This trip back I noticed I can’t spell #12 in the comments godd should have been good.

    God Bless America, God Save The Republic

  17. thanks on September 1st, 2005 3:54 pm

    Very nice

  18. California Culinary Academy on September 7th, 2005 5:30 am

    Culinary Arts College

  19. Search Engine Optimization on September 7th, 2005 10:48 am

    Job Search Engine

  20. J. M. Fritz on January 5th, 2006 11:13 pm

    amen!