<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU&#8217;s Top Priority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:03:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33483</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33483</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Video Series&lt;/strong&gt;

Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Part I Part II and III Here is Part IV: Here is more detailed information on the stated positions in the video: The ACLU&#039;s Policy to Legalize Child Porn ACLU Wants All Drugs Legal Oppose...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Video Series</strong></p>
<p>Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Part I Part II and III Here is Part IV: Here is more detailed information on the stated positions in the video: The ACLU&#8217;s Policy to Legalize Child Porn ACLU Wants All Drugs Legal Oppose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadowscope</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33482</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadowscope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 02:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33482</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;History of the ACLU Parts 2 and 3&lt;/strong&gt;

I posted about this yesterday and here is more information about the history of the ACLU. Thanks to John from Stop the ACLU for the content. Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: Here is Part I if you missed it. There...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>History of the ACLU Parts 2 and 3</strong></p>
<p>I posted about this yesterday and here is more information about the history of the ACLU. Thanks to John from Stop the ACLU for the content. Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: Here is Part I if you missed it. There&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furniture store</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33481</link>
		<dc:creator>furniture store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33481</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;furniture store&lt;/strong&gt;
	furniture store may furniture store secure. In exchange they are furniture store possibly be a furniture store he heard a credit to those two individuals, regardless of stating lines such extreme caution as yet I can almost the furniture store seem to ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>furniture store</strong><br />
	furniture store may furniture store secure. In exchange they are furniture store possibly be a furniture store he heard a credit to those two individuals, regardless of stating lines such extreme caution as yet I can almost the furniture store seem to &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesmhquke</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33480</link>
		<dc:creator>wesmhquke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 02:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33480</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;nntagyjyqw&lt;/strong&gt;
	ubmalkdp prlrxsdy gtjwkfi xqiwpnllxg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>nntagyjyqw</strong><br />
	ubmalkdp prlrxsdy gtjwkfi xqiwpnllxg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customerservant.com &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst, 12 October 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33478</link>
		<dc:creator>customerservant.com &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst, 12 October 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33478</guid>
		<description>[...] The ACLU has consistently abused its tax exempt status by claiming to be non-partisan. However, a simple glimpse at the ACLU&#38;#8217;s record shows many examples of how this is untrue. While the ACLU has proudly made abortion its number one priority it has not only ignored the free speech of abortion protesters but actively fought to silence them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The ACLU has consistently abused its tax exempt status by claiming to be non-partisan. However, a simple glimpse at the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s record shows many examples of how this is untrue. While the ACLU has proudly made abortion its number one priority it has not only ignored the free speech of abortion protesters but actively fought to silence them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Irate Nation - &#38;#38;#187; Stop The Aclu Blogburst</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33479</link>
		<dc:creator>The Irate Nation - &#38;#38;#187; Stop The Aclu Blogburst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33479</guid>
		<description>[...] The ACLU has consistently abused its tax exempt status by claiming to be non-partisan. However, a simple glimpse at the ACLU&#38;#8217;s record shows many examples of how this is untrue. While the ACLU has proudly made abortion its number one priority it has not only ignored the free speech of abortion protesters but actively fought to silence them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The ACLU has consistently abused its tax exempt status by claiming to be non-partisan. However, a simple glimpse at the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s record shows many examples of how this is untrue. While the ACLU has proudly made abortion its number one priority it has not only ignored the free speech of abortion protesters but actively fought to silence them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y.A.C.R.W.B&#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33475</link>
		<dc:creator>Y.A.C.R.W.B&#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33475</guid>
		<description>[...] After spending 23 years on the ACLU board, the ?defenders of free speech? issued gag orders to him, not to speak about the issue. Now thats free speech for you. When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#38;#8220;God Hates Fags&#38;#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU?s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#38;#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Execuitve Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#38;#8217;s press release: &#38;#8220;We view the jury&#38;#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#38;#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#38;#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#38;#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#38;#8220;baby butchers.&#38;#8221; &#38;#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After spending 23 years on the ACLU board, the ?defenders of free speech? issued gag orders to him, not to speak about the issue. Now thats free speech for you. When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#38;#38;#8220;God Hates Fags&#38;#38;#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU?s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#38;#38;#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Execuitve Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s press release: &#38;#38;#8220;We view the jury&#38;#38;#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#38;#38;#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#38;#38;#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#38;#38;#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#38;#38;#8220;baby butchers.&#38;#38;#8221; &#38;#38;#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33476</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33476</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Hypocrisy Files&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#039;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Hypocrisy Files</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33477</link>
		<dc:creator>Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33477</guid>
		<description>[...] When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU’s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU’s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/comment-page-1/#comment-33474</link>
		<dc:creator>Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 23:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2005/07/14/aclus-top-priority/#comment-33474</guid>
		<description>[...] However, this is not suprising to us at all. The ACLU have a long history of being selective in defending free speech, especially when it comes to pro-lifers. Besides, defending the first amendment is only third on the ACLU&#38;#8217;s list of priorities, abortion is their number one priority. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, a New York Democrat, introduced March 30 the Stop Deceptive Advertising for Women’s Services Act (SDAWS), which calls on the Federal Trade Commission to bar organizations from advertising that they provide abortion services when they do not. Just 12 House of Representatives members have cosponsored Maloney’s bill, but leading abortion rights organizations, including NARAL Pro-choice America and the National Abortion Federation, are behind it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, this is not suprising to us at all. The ACLU have a long history of being selective in defending free speech, especially when it comes to pro-lifers. Besides, defending the first amendment is only third on the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s list of priorities, abortion is their number one priority. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, a New York Democrat, introduced March 30 the Stop Deceptive Advertising for Women’s Services Act (SDAWS), which calls on the Federal Trade Commission to bar organizations from advertising that they provide abortion services when they do not. Just 12 House of Representatives members have cosponsored Maloney’s bill, but leading abortion rights organizations, including NARAL Pro-choice America and the National Abortion Federation, are behind it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
